Re: Bug#510894: (www.debian.org: DWN Index for 2007 also shows 2006 issues)

On Mon, 30 May 2011 22:49:04 -0400 David Prévot wrote: > Your explanation makes sense. I just tested your patch locally to > english/template/debian/projectnews/index.wml and didn't notice any > regression, so you're welcome to commit your change directly, no need to > be shy ;-). thanks for tes

Re: Bug#510894: (www.debian.org: DWN Index for 2007 also shows 2006 issues)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Thanks for digging this one further. Le 30/05/2011 02:59, victory a écrit : > year's indexes pass a $noyear and latest doesn't, so let's use it > change from > if ($year == $currentyear && $count < 10 && $reccount < 3 ) { > to > if

Re: Bug#510894: (www.debian.org: DWN Index for 2007 also shows 2006 issues)

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:06:13 + David Prévot wrote: > Great, thanks for digging it, I also applied your patch to > english/template/debian/projectnews/index.wml so it works also for the > 2009 (but it doesn't work for the current year, of course, not sure it's > really an issue anyway, let's dr

Bug#510894: marked as done (www.debian.org: DWN Index for 2007 also shows 2006 issues)

Your message dated Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:04:25 -0400 with message-id <4db57f69.20...@tilapin.org> and subject line Re: Bug#510894: www.debian.org: DWN Index for 2007 also shows 2006 issues has caused the Debian Bug report #510894, regarding www.debian.org: DWN Index for 2007 also shows 2006

Re: Bug#510894: www.debian.org: DWN Index for 2007 also shows 2006 issues

Tags: patch past years only want the same year's and don't want to include previous year's. only CURRENT year wants more entry. open(CURRENT, "CURRENT-ISSUE-IS") or open(CURRENT, "$eng_dir/CURRENT-ISSUE-IS") or return ''; my $currentissue=;# chomp $currentissue;

Bug#510894: www.debian.org: DWN Index for 2007 also shows 2006 issues

Am Montag, den 05.01.2009, 20:28 +0100 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann: > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: minor > > Looking at http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2007/index I see the > latest issue from 03 Jul 2007 up to 26 Sep 2006, but since this is a > yearly index page for 2007, it should stop at

Bug#510894: www.debian.org: DWN Index for 2007 also shows 2006 issues

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Looking at http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2007/index I see the latest issue from 03 Jul 2007 up to 26 Sep 2006, but since this is a yearly index page for 2007, it should stop at 23 Jan 2007. -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helge

Bug#424003: marked as done (DWN index page inconsistency)

Your message dated Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:49:38 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424003: DWN index page inconsistency has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#233501: marked as done (www.debian.org: DWN index for 2004 lists some 2003 issues )

Your message dated Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:49:38 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424003: DWN index page inconsistency has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#424003: DWN index page inconsistency

On Tue, 15 May 2007, Anthony Wong wrote: > The DWN 2007 index page (http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2007/) says > "Here are the back issues of Debian Weekly News for 2007.", but > besides news from 2007, there are also news from 2006. Since the > content in this page is generated by > english/tem

Processed: Re: Bug#424003: DWN index page inconsistency

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 424003 233501 Bug#424003: DWN index page inconsistency Bug#233501: www.debian.org: DWN index for 2004 lists some 2003 issues Forcibly Merged 233501 424003. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Bug#424003: DWN index page inconsistency

forcemerge 424003 233501 thanks On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 05:59:22PM +0800, Anthony Wong wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: normal > [..] > english/template/debian/weeklynews/index.wml The perl script will > output news from the previous year if there are fewer than 10 news in > the curren

Bug#424003: DWN index page inconsistency

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal The DWN 2007 index page (http://www.debian.org/News/weekly/2007/) says "Here are the back issues of Debian Weekly News for 2007.", but besides news from 2007, there are also news from 2006. Since the content in this page is generated by english/template/de

Bug#233501: www.debian.org: DWN index for 2004 lists some 2003 issues

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:37:07 +0100, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-18 12:55]: >> For some reason, (and also >> the parent page which appears to >> be identical

Bug#233501: www.debian.org: DWN index for 2004 lists some 2003 issues

* era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-18 12:55]: > For some reason, (and also > the parent page which appears to > be identical as far as I can quickly tell) contains some DWN issues > from Dec 2003 although it's s

Bug#233501: www.debian.org: DWN index for 2004 lists some 2003 issues

Package: www.debian.org Version: 20040218 Severity: minor For some reason, (and also the parent page which appears to be identical as far as I can quickly tell) contains some DWN issues from Dec 2003 although it's suppo

Bug#82852: marked as done (DWN index for each year needs to depend on all the issues for that year)

Your message dated Wed, 7 Nov 2001 00:36:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Re: Bug#82852: DWN index for each year needs to depend on all the issues for that year

On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 01:52:53PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 12:25:45AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > > Looks like I should commit my patch about automatic dependencies ;) > > It does not automagically handle such complicated stuff, but it should > > be quite trivial to ad

Re: Bug#82852: DWN index for each year needs to depend on all the issues for that year

On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 12:25:45AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > Looks like I should commit my patch about automatic dependencies ;) > It does not automagically handle such complicated stuff, but it should > be quite trivial to adapt it. > I still wonder whether overhead caused by dependency comput

Re: Bug#82852: DWN index for each year needs to depend on all the issues for that year

[removed Cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 11:54:11PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 10:52:12PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > | I just tried to fix this, but it didn't seem to work. My thoughts were: > > | > > | */index.$(LANGUAGE).html: %/index.$(LANGUAGE).

Bug#82852: DWN index for each year needs to depend on all the issues for that year

* Josip Rodin | I just tried to fix this, but it didn't seem to work. My thoughts were: | | */index.$(LANGUAGE).html: %/index.$(LANGUAGE).html: $(wildcard $*/*/index.wml) | $(wildcard $(ENGLISHSRCDIR)/News/weekly/$*/*) \ | $(TEMPLDIR)/weeklynews/header.wml \ | $(TEMPLDIR)/weekl

Re: Bug#82852: DWN index for each year needs to depend on all the issues for that year

On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 10:52:12PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > | I just tried to fix this, but it didn't seem to work. My thoughts were: > | > | */index.$(LANGUAGE).html: %/index.$(LANGUAGE).html: $(wildcard > $*/*/index.wml) > | $(wildcard $(ENGLISHSRCDIR)/News/weekly/$*/*) \ > |

Bug#82852: DWN index for each year needs to depend on all the issues for that year

Hi, On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:42:06 -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: > > The Makefile dependencies are broken. I mailed a fix earlier > > today, but it still doesn't capture that the annual indices should > > depend on the issues for that year. I'll try to come up with a > > solution this evening. > > I ca

Re: DWN index

On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 04:27:52PM +0200, Peter Karlsson wrote: > This is strange. After the Swedish pages were re-generated, it seems > that the DWN index took the dates from the English version instead of > the Swedish one. > > How come? > I just regenerated swedish/News/we

Re: DWN index

Darren O. Benham wrote: > That could be how the scripts are set up. I'll look at it when I get to > work. The dates on the index come from the PAGENAME variable that is set at the top of each page. If you translate a page and translate that too, it should work. -- see shy jo

Re: DWN index

On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 04:27:52PM +0200, Peter Karlsson wrote: > This is strange. After the Swedish pages were re-generated, it seems > that the DWN index took the dates from the English version instead of > the Swedish one. > > How come? > That could be how the scripts are

DWN index

This is strange. After the Swedish pages were re-generated, it seems that the DWN index took the dates from the English version instead of the Swedish one. How come? -- \\// peter - exjobb @ ///