On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 09:54:17PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I see the following solutions:
1) Use the current script parse-advisory.pl. It may be ugly but it does the
trick in nearly all cases. DSA's are committed automatically and the web
team reads the commit diffs and corrects after
Hi Simon,
On Mon, July 7, 2008 19:55, Simon Paillard wrote:
> Indeed, the current solution doesn't handle DSA--x with x > 1.
> That is due to the workflow (we try to parse a mail without any strong
> structure, while the data are structured in dak / security-tracker, as far
> as I understood f
Hello Thijs,
Sorry for the late ..
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:05:29AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Fri, June 13, 2008 12:32, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> >> Applied as well :)
> >> (I assume that all DSA fit on a unique web page per year, assumption
> >> true past years)
> >>
> >> So now, the o
Hi Simon,
On Fri, June 13, 2008 12:32, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
>
>> Applied as well :)
>>
>>
>>
>> (I assume that all DSA fit on a unique web page per year, assumption
>> true past years)
>>
>> So now, the only remaining manual work to do is the check step.
>>
>
> This script seems to
Hi Simon,
> Applied as well :)
>
>
> (I assume that all DSA fit on a unique web page per year, assumption
> true past years)
>
> So now, the only remaining manual work to do is the check step.
This script seems to be working fine now for a while and only in a few
cases do I need to change the out
Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 12:28:31PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:28:39AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > > > > On Friday 11 April 2008 12:40, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > Because it has not reached the archive yet I guess
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 12:28:31PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Simon Paillard wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:28:39AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > > > On Friday 11 April 2008 12:40, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > Because it has not reached the archive yet I guess.
> > I will add a warning like
Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:56:31AM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:28:39AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > > > On Friday 11 April 2008 12:40, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:33:04AM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > > >
Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:28:39AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > > On Friday 11 April 2008 12:40, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:33:04AM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > > > Next step, discover the right link to
> > > > > lists.debian.org/.../ms
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:56:31AM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:28:39AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > > On Friday 11 April 2008 12:40, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:33:04AM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > > > Next step, discover the right
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:28:39AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > On Friday 11 April 2008 12:40, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:33:04AM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > > Next step, discover the right link to lists.debian.org/.../msgN.html
[..]
> While we're at it, I
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Friday 11 April 2008 12:40, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:33:04AM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > Next step, discover the right link to lists.debian.org/.../msgN.html
> >
> > Applied as well :)
> >
> > (I assume that all DSA f
Hi Simon,
On Friday 11 April 2008 12:40, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:33:04AM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > Next step, discover the right link to lists.debian.org/.../msgN.html
>
> Applied as well :)
>
> (I assume that all DSA fit on a unique web page per year, assumpt
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:33:04AM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> Next step, discover the right link to lists.debian.org/.../msgN.html
Applied as well :)
(I assume that all DSA fit on a unique web page per year, assumption
true past years)
So now, the only remaining manual work to do is the
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:07:30PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
> If the script is not convenient enough for you, I can try to automate a
> bit the task, but I think it needs instead to be included in your
> process of DSA releasing.
Here attached is the little patch I applied to the CVS :
* you
On Tue, February 5, 2008 23:02, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Thijs volunteered to automate the processing of the advisories to webwml.
Yeah, I will. But until that's fixed, DSA's need to be added to the
website still. I'll do that, but of course cannot be sure I'll be present
every day to fix the n
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:07:30PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
> Dear DSA senders,
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 06:48:20PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:43:13PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:00:33AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> [..]
Dear DSA senders,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 06:48:20PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:43:13PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:00:33AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
[..]
> > > http://www.debian.org/security/ is just as far behind, as is the feed
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:43:13PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:00:33AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > Looking at http://www.debian.org/ today (2008-01-25), i noticed that
> > the security section of the home page is out of date. I only lists
> > through DSA 1467,
Hi Daniel,
> Looking at http://www.debian.org/ today (2008-01-25), i noticed that
> the security section of the home page is out of date. I only lists through
> DSA 1467, which is nearly a week old at this point. There are
> 10 more-recent DSAs missing from the list.
> http://www.debian.org/secu
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:00:33AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Looking at http://www.debian.org/ today (2008-01-25), i noticed that
> the security section of the home page is out of date. I only lists
> through DSA 1467, which is nearly a week old at this point. There are
> 10 more-recent
Hey debian folks on the security and web teams--
Looking at http://www.debian.org/ today (2008-01-25), i noticed that
the security section of the home page is out of date. I only lists
through DSA 1467, which is nearly a week old at this point. There are
10 more-recent DSAs missing from the list
22 matches
Mail list logo
