On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:31:22AM -0700, doug jensen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:58:01AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
> wrote:
> > [1] It was meant to request for Co-Maintainers, but RFC is not appropriate,
> > IMHO. RFH might be misleading too (the help tag on BTS). Perheps RFU
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:58:01AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> [1] It was meant to request for Co-Maintainers, but RFC is not appropriate,
> IMHO. RFH might be misleading too (the help tag on BTS). Perheps RFU
> (Uploaders) can be used, but I'm not sure.
Maybe, RFM - Request For
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 02:29:22PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> >From a technical point of view I can add as many new tags as you want.
> But there at least two other criteria:
> - It must be documented. Patches welcome
> - Someone must make the decision which tags to accept. I can only
> pr
[CCing [EMAIL PROTECTED] for comment]
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:58:01AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:58:11PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > The script is webwml/english/devel/wnpp/wnpp.pl from the webwml CVS.
> >
> > > Can those be easily extende
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:58:11PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> The script is webwml/english/devel/wnpp/wnpp.pl from the webwml CVS.
>
> > Can those be easily extended to include a Request For Sponsor report?
>
> Yes, should be no problem. All they do is parsing the subject, so
> it's basica
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:22:07PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> What scripts create the WNPP reports, such as being_packaged and so forth?
The script is webwml/english/devel/wnpp/wnpp.pl from the webwml CVS.
> Can those be easily extended to include a Request For Sponsor report?
Yes, should b
What scripts create the WNPP reports, such as being_packaged and so forth?
Can those be easily extended to include a Request For Sponsor report?
- Matt
7 matches
Mail list logo
