Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2023 04:09:30 +0200
with message-id <25908.33882.205193.353...@cs.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #268658,
regarding Provide a signed checksum file for all the archive contents
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hello Saleh,
Am 07.10.20 um 05:13 schrieb Saleh DP:
> Hi,
>
> I had a bad day trying to find the link to checksum file of your netinst
> .iso file on:
> debian.org/distrib/netinst <http://debian.org/distrib/netinst>
> where there SUPPOSED to be a link to that!
you ar
Hi,
I had a bad day trying to find the link to checksum file of your netinst
.iso file on:
debian.org/distrib/netinst
where there SUPPOSED to be a link to that!
There should be at least a link to list of checksum files on TECHNICAL
"verify" guidance, but there is not any either!
Regards
Hi,
I had no idea where to find the checksum files and where to find the iso-cd
etc. folders.
I think here: https://www.debian.org/distrib/netinst
should be a link in the text to:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/
so that the user can easily find and download the .sign
Le 29/09/2016 à 00:14, Stéphane Blondon a écrit :
> It's time to wait now. As you say, I will remind you about the task in
> one week or two if it's not done.
>
Steve added the checksums few weeks ago. I committed the removal of the
old checksum algorithms in th
Le 27/09/2016 à 23:38, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 09:24:09AM +0200, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
>> I could commit the current version (with Holger's fix), wait for the
>> checksum generations, then commit the removal of the MD5 sentence.
>> So you can
o. I'm currently away from home at a conference...
>
>Great!
>I could commit the current version (with Holger's fix), wait for the
>checksum generations, then commit the removal of the MD5 sentence.
>So you can take time when you will be back from your conference.
>
>O
he current version (with Holger's fix), wait for the
checksum generations, then commit the removal of the MD5 sentence.
So you can take time when you will be back from your conference.
Ok for you?
--
Stéphane
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 01:17:44AM +0200, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
>Le 26/09/2016 à 20:03, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
>> To be honest, it might just be easier to go back and generate better
>> checksums for the older releases. It won't take too long, and would
>> simplify the docs and make it easier f
Le 26/09/2016 à 20:03, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
> To be honest, it might just be easier to go back and generate better
> checksums for the older releases. It won't take too long, and would
> simplify the docs and make it easier for users. How does that sound?
It's probably the best solution for th
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 07:57:06PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Stéphane Blondon wrote:
>> After checking in the archive, MD5 checksum only is for very old releases:
>>
>> v.7: SHA512, SHA256, SHA1, MD5
>> v.6: SHA512, SHA256, SHA1, MD5
>> v.5: SH
Hi,
Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> After checking in the archive, MD5 checksum only is for very old releases:
>
> v.7: SHA512, SHA256, SHA1, MD5
> v.6: SHA512, SHA256, SHA1, MD5
> v.5: SHA1, MD5
> v.4: SHA1, MD5
> v.3.1: MD5
>
> So what do you think about:
>
>
Le 25/09/2016 à 22:02, Holger Wansing a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Stéphane Blondon wrote:
>> To validate the contents of a CD image, just be sure to use the
>> appropriate checksum tool.
>> -For older archived CD releases, only MD5 checksums were generated in
>> -
Hi,
Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> To validate the contents of a CD image, just be sure to use the
> appropriate checksum tool.
> -For older archived CD releases, only MD5 checksums were generated in
> -the MD5SUMS files; you should use the tool
> -md5sum to work with these.
> -
Hello,
on the page https://www.debian.org/CD/verify.en.html, the explanation is
more based on MD5 than on better checksum algorithms. I think it would
be better to talk about SHA512 for default example and MD5 as fallback only.
I made a patch for that (see attachment).
I removed the reference
debian-cdimage/archive/5.0.0/";
> but
> the checksum for CD 17 is broken. Note that bittorrent and jigdo fail to find
> any download sources. Please let me know where I might find this file... or
> if
> it is gone forever.
http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#old
Note that debia
Debian:
I attempting to download the original Debian 5.0.0 source code (ISO CDs) from
the debian archive. The only available download source for these old files I
know of is "http://ftp.riken.jp/Linux/debian/debian-cdimage/archive/5.0.0/"; but
the checksum for CD 17 is broken.
@Matt Kraai:
I was looking for checksum files for netinst iso at
http://www.debian.org/distrib/netinst. I think put an extra link to file
with checksums be ok.
@Richard Atterer:
Hmm, i must say i don't look at this FAQ (my fault), 'cause i don't
wanna download debian with jigd
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:21:50PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:48:12PM +0100, Damian Wielocha wrote:
> > I was having problem to find links for debian iso checksums, but guys
> > from ircnet channel help me. I think, mabye You could add them to
> > official site to hel
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:48:12PM +0100, Damian Wielocha wrote:
> I was having problem to find links for debian iso checksums, but guys
> from ircnet channel help me. I think, mabye You could add them to
> official site to help some newbie in future.
Thanks for the suggestion. Where did you
Hi,
I was having problem to find links for debian iso checksums, but guys
from ircnet channel help me. I think, mabye You could add them to
official site to help some newbie in future.
Greatz,
Damian W.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 303961 Provide a signed checksum file for all the archive contents
Bug#303961: ftp.debian.org: Provide a signed checksum file for all the
Changed Bug title to `Provide a signed checksum file for all the archive
contents&#x
Am Dienstag, den 03.06.2008, 14:35 -0500 schrieb Nate:
> The following link seems to have an invalid file or info:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/source/etch/vrms.
>
> When I downloaded the file vrms_1.12-0.1.tar.gz, my checksum is
> different and the file size is 40 kB, not
-0.1.tar.gz>,
> my checksum is different and the file size is 40 kB, not 9 kB.
No problem here, it is consistent with what the page displays:
$ wget http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/v/vrms/vrms_1.12-0.1.tar.gz
[..]
9,585 --.-K/s in 0.02s
$ ls -l vrms_1.12-0.1.tar.gz
9585 Ja
Hello,
The following link seems to have an invalid file or info:
http://packages.debian.org/source/etch/vrms.
When I downloaded the file
vrms_1.12-0.1.tar.gz<http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/v/vrms/vrms_1.12-0.1.tar.gz>,
my checksum is different and the file size is 40 kB, no
Hi,
> Page
> http://packages.debian.org/oldstable/source/quota
> In the table named Download quota:
>
> quota_3.04-1.diff.gz is supposed to be 11.3 kB, but in reality it is
> more than 40 kB and the checksum is wrong.
The diff.gz file /is/ 11.3KB. The .diff it contains, on th
Dear Sirs,
I was unable to install quota 3.04 due to
following error:
Page
http://packages.debian.org/oldstable/source/quota
In the table named Download quota:
quota_3.04-1.diff.gz is supposed to be 11.3 kB,
but in reality it is more than 40 kB and the checksum is wrong.
Thanks for
Hi',
on pages security, the message :
MD5 checksums of the listed files are available in the original
advisory.
is not translated. The po-file is not taken in account.
Can someone fix it ?
Cheers,
--
Pierre Machard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
28 matches
Mail list logo
