Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> now that Stretch is under LTS (but there are no different point-release
> version-numbers for lts-archs and non-lts-archs), I have applied the part
> of the patch, needed to display both sets of supported archs (lts archs
> and initially-releases archs) on the release
Hi Holger
El 21/7/20 a las 9:23, Holger Wansing escribió:
> Hi,
>
> now that Stretch is under LTS (but there are no different point-release
> version-numbers for lts-archs and non-lts-archs), I have applied the part
> of the patch, needed to display both sets of supported archs (lts archs
> and i
Hi,
now that Stretch is under LTS (but there are no different point-release
version-numbers for lts-archs and non-lts-archs), I have applied the part
of the patch, needed to display both sets of supported archs (lts archs
and initially-releases archs) on the release page
(also already done for Jes
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> Since start of LTS for Stretch is near:
> A patch for Stretch is attached here. (I have rephrased things a little.)
I noticed, that that patch is not complete, it is lacking
english/template/debian/installer.wml
Sorry for that!
Added that one + some wording chang
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> > I managed to get this running. A patch is attached.
> > Even if LTS period for jessie is nearly at its end, I created this patch for
> > the Jessie pages, because that gives the possibility to test it NOW (since
> > the jessie 8.11.0
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> I managed to get this running. A patch is attached.
> Even if LTS period for jessie is nearly at its end, I created this patch for
> the Jessie pages, because that gives the possibility to test it NOW (since
> the jessie 8.11.0 and 8.11.1 images are now in place, but S
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> I managed to get this running. A patch is attached.
> Even if LTS period for jessie is nearly at its end, I created this patch for
> the Jessie pages, because that gives the possibility to test it NOW (since
> the jessie 8.11.0 and 8.11.1 images are now in place, but S
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> I managed to get this running. A patch is attached.
Now it really attached :-)
Holger
--
Holger Wansing
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
diff --git a/english/releases/jessie/index.wml b/english/releases/jessie/index.wml
index 55
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Holger for caring about this issue.
> > A related problem with jessie is that we have 8.11.0 images for all the
> > arches, but 8.11.1 images only for the LTS arches.
> >
> > see
> > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive
Hi,
Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks Holger for caring about this issue.
> A related problem with jessie is that we have 8.11.0 images for all the
> arches, but 8.11.1 images only for the LTS arches.
>
> see
> https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/8.11.0/
> and
> https://cdimage.d
Hi
Thanks Holger for caring about this issue.
A related problem with jessie is that we have 8.11.0 images for all the
arches, but 8.11.1 images only for the LTS arches.
see
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/8.11.0/
and
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/8.11.1/
So right now many
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-CC: b...@decadent.org.uk
>
> Debians Jessie release page lists only 4 archs (i386, amd64, armel and armhf)
> as
> supported archs. These are the LTS-supported archs.
> This is inconsistent with the other release
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: b...@decadent.org.uk
Debians Jessie release page lists only 4 archs (i386, amd64, armel and armhf)
as
supported archs. These are the LTS-supported archs.
This is inconsistent with the other release pages. They globally list all
archs,
whic
13 matches
Mail list logo
