Re: Bug#90649: marked as done (machines.cgi reports bad file descriptor)

2001-03-27 Thread David Martinez CSIC RedIRIS
El Mar 27 Mar 2001 00:11, escribiste: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:31:48PM +0200, David Martinez wrote: > > > > Package: www.debian.org > > > > Version: N/A; reported 2001-03-21 > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > > > When accessing http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, it returns > > > > "Bad file d

Re: Bug#90649: marked as done (machines.cgi reports bad file descriptor)

2001-03-26 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:31:48PM +0200, David Martinez wrote: > > > Package: www.debian.org > > > Version: N/A; reported 2001-03-21 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > When accessing http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, it returns > > > "Bad file descriptor". No html is returned at all. > > > > Ple

Re: Bug#90649: marked as done (machines.cgi reports bad file descriptor)

2001-03-26 Thread David Martinez
El Jue 22 Mar 2001 17:38, Debian Bug Tracking System escribió: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 06:48:31PM -0800, Shane Wegner wrote: > > Package: www.debian.org > > Version: N/A; reported 2001-03-21 > > Severity: normal > > > > When accessing http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, it returns > > "Bad file de

Bug#90649: marked as done (machines.cgi reports bad file descriptor)

2001-03-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:30:12 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#90649: machines.cgi reports bad file descriptor has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca