Bug#615938: ARM on the ports page

Hi, On Wednesday 02 March 2011 11.39:12 Hector Oron wrote: > arm is not part of current stable release (Squeeze). Should it be > entirely drop it from the website? lenny was stable not that long ago and still gets security updates. I'd say drop it after wheezy release. cheers -- vbi -- You c

Bug#615938: ARM on the ports page

Hello, 2011/3/2 Adrian von Bidder : > +++ > Index: index.wml > === > RCS file: /cvsroot/webwml/webwml/english/ports/index.wml,v > retrieving revision 1.85 > diff -u -r1.85 index.wml > --- index.wml   6 Feb 2011 08:15:53 -       1

Bug#615938: ARM on the ports page

Heyho all! Thanks for your input. As per this discussion (changed wording for arm/armel; dropped armeb), full diff with some changes against the current index.wml below. Can somebody commit this? I don't have commit access to www. cheers -- vbi +++ Index: index.wml =

Bug#615938: ARM on the ports page

On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:57:54PM +, Wookey wrote: > Perhaps add that armhf matches Ubuntu and Linaro 'arm' ports, whilst > armel in Ubuntu is not the same as armel in Debian? Hum, that's confusing and not true in various ways. The Ubuntu armel port (there is no Ubuntu 'arm' port) is binary-

Bug#615938: ARM on the ports page

+++ Adrian von Bidder [2011-03-01 16:20 +0100]: > Hi, > > > > I proposed a few improvements to the "ports" page on www.d.o, some touching > the ARM status. Well done - it's been old and crufty for a long time. > Since I'm not involve

Bug#615938: ARM on the ports page

Hi, I proposed a few improvements to the "ports" page on www.d.o, some touching the ARM status. Since I'm not involved with porting myself, perhaps some of you may want to comment. I'm especially unsure about the armeb port - it wasn'