* Martin Michlmayr [2012-03-23 16:28:24 CET]:
> - And Zack suggested sorting by % donated to Debian.
It still sounds fishy to claim that debian.ch donates 100% to Debian.
Actually, debian.ch is not a vendor but a reseller of goods from others,
and those organizations don't donate their profit t
I wanted to comment on this bug:
Regarding trusted organizations and the web site: not all of them sell
merchandise. The trusted organizations should be listed on
http://www.debian.org/donations There is bug #634986 already for
which I'll accept ownership.
Regarding the merchandise web page: I
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:41:58PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> > [ Quoted text reordered ]
> Strange, I found Francesca's reply quite clear and linear/successive,
> especially considering that the two problems we are discussing are yes
> linked, but the solution is independent from one to the othe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 613832 + patch
Bug #613832 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: Debian sister association in the
merchandise page
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
613832: http://bugs.debian.or
tags 613832 + patch
thanks
Hi there!
Adding i...@debian.ch to the cc: given that it is used as an example,
please someone on the board corrects me if something below is wrong.
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:43:43 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ Quoted text reordered ]
Strange, I found Francesca's
[ Adding auditor@d.o to the list of recipients, as part of the issue
here is where they'd like to maintain the list of trusted
organizations. Auditors: all context is available in #613832 ]
[ Quoted text reordered ]
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 05:27:35PM +0100, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> Last but n
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 08:36:08AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Thursday 17 February 2011 19.17:58 Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> > So, what you think about it?
>
> Yes, I think the patch shows the direction I had in mind. Not sure if it
> should say for debian.ch (and other such organisations
On Thursday 17 February 2011 19.17:58 Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> So, what you think about it?
Yes, I think the patch shows the direction I had in mind. Not sure if it
should say for debian.ch (and other such organisations, if they should come
to be listed here) "the vendor is a Debian organisatio
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 04:31:17PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi there!
>
> I think we need to document this somewhere and with my events@d.o hat on
> this is the BTS. Please keep it cc:ed when the discussion is relevant
> or follow-up on de
9 matches
Mail list logo
