On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:14:43PM +0300, Tommi Vainikainen wrote:
> On 2005-08-12T16:03:20+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Tommi Vainikainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's not worth relicensing from one set of non-free terms to
> > another, unless you think the current licence is harder to
On 2005-08-12T16:03:20+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tommi Vainikainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not worth relicensing from one set of non-free terms to
> another, unless you think the current licence is harder to
> understand than the longer CC licences, or something. With any
> luck,
Tommi Vainikainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I made this bug report, I thought also that maybe it would be a
> good idea to change license to something better known, for example
> some of Creative Commons?
It's not worth relicensing from one set of non-free terms to
another, unless you thi
On 2005-10-14T14:44:00+0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Currently WWW Pages license page
> http://www.de.debian.org/license > has a link to Open
> Publication License at
> http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/ >. However this url is not
> working. Luckily there is a local copy in our web pages.
Whil
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Currently WWW Pages license page
http://www.de.debian.org/license > has a link to Open
Publication License at
http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/ >. However this url is not
working. Luckily there is a local copy in our web pages.
-- System Information:
Deb
5 matches
Mail list logo
