Bug#260274: marked as done (Copyright links on (at least) 111 package pages brocken)

Your message dated Sun, 1 Aug 2004 02:08:51 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#260274: has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#260274:

Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Frank Lichtenheld: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 09:57:10PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote: > > Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Frank Lichtenheld: > > > merge 260274 231408 > > > thanks > > > > Hm, I though I have read > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.

Bug#260274:

On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 01:03:49AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 09:57:10PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote: > > Ok, but what's wrong with it in this 111 cases? > > No debian/copyright in the source package. Since this is only > a "should" in policy I can't file bugs against

Bug#260274: Copyright links on (at least) 111 package pages brocken (was: Bug#260274: http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html possibly outdated)

* Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-19 21:16]: > > >me>/packagename_version>/copyright are broken, because the files doesn't > > > > > I tried for one random package (bugzilla) and got the right changelog. > Changelog file is not the case here, the _copyright_ files does not exist. Sorry,

Bug#260274:

On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 09:57:10PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Frank Lichtenheld: > > merge 260274 231408 > > thanks > > > Hm, I though I have read > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=www.debian.org > carefully, but I have overlooked this. Sorr

Bug#260274:

Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Frank Lichtenheld: > merge 260274 231408 > thanks > Hm, I though I have read http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=www.debian.org carefully, but I have overlooked this. Sorry for this. > On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 08:05:16PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:

Bug#260274: http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html possibly outdated

merge 260274 231408 thanks On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 08:05:16PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > > The site http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/no_watch.html pointed me on this bug. Bug is known (see merge), but I'm still reluctant to have to unpack each binary package to get all c

Bug#260274: Copyright links on (at least) 111 package pages brocken (was: Bug#260274: http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html possibly outdated)

Hello Martin! Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Martin Michlmayr: > * Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-19 20:05]: > > The site http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/no_watch.html pointed me on this > > bug. > > > > There are 111 package pages > > http://packages.debian.org/unstable//, > > Why

Processed: Re: Bug#260274: http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html possibly outdated

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 260274 231408 Bug#231408: packages.debian.org: copyright files are missing for some packages Bug#260274: Copyright links on (at least) 111 package pages brocken Merged 231408 260274. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#260274: http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html possibly outdated

* Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-19 20:05]: > The site http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/no_watch.html pointed me on this bug. > > There are 111 package pages > http://packages.debian.org/unstable//, Why does the Subject mention http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html when your bug is about c

Bug#260274: http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html possibly outdated

Package: www.debian.org The site http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/no_watch.html pointed me on this bug. There are 111 package pages http://packages.debian.org/unstable//, where copyright links to http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main///packagename_version>/copyright are broken, because t