Re: Processed: Re: Bug#21620: marked as done (www.debian.org should support more archs for hamm)

2001-01-14 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 12:12:03PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > reopen 21620 > Bug#21620: packages.debian.org: should support multiple architectures > Bug is already open, cannot reopen. > > > retitle 21620 package download pages shou

Processed: Re: Bug#21620: marked as done (www.debian.org should support more archs for hamm)

2001-01-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 21620 Bug#21620: packages.debian.org: should support multiple architectures Bug is already open, cannot reopen. > retitle 21620 package download pages should support multiple architectures Bug#21620: packages.debian.org: should support multiple

Re: Bug#21620: marked as done (www.debian.org should support more archs for hamm)

2000-10-18 Thread Josip Rodin
reopen 21620 retitle 21620 package download pages should support multiple architectures thanks On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 05:05:48PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > From: Hartmut Koptein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: www.debian.org should support more archs for hamm > > Package: www.debi

Bug#21620: marked as done (www.debian.org should support more archs for hamm)

2000-10-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:57:18 +1100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line old has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the B