Hi,
On Donnerstag, 30. April 2009, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> What about "NMMN"? It is already listed without email address. Should we
> delete this entry as well?
NMMN afaik hosts at least one .debian.org machine plus two m68k debian.net
machines, so I assume they'd like to stay listed.
BCC:ing
On Thu,30.Apr.09, 18:52:48, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> We received a request for removal the email field from a consultants
> entry. I am wondering if this is possible at all, since (I believe) we
> should retain the email address in order to get in touch with the
> consultants, or to verify further r
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 30/04/2009 alle 13.09 -0700, Don Armstrong ha scritto:
> [...]
> > There should be a publicly available e-mail address that the
> > consultant can be contacted at (and responds to e-mail sent to it
> > within four weeks). If the consultant
Il giorno gio, 30/04/2009 alle 13.09 -0700, Don Armstrong ha scritto:
[...]
> There should be a publicly available e-mail address that the
> consultant can be contacted at (and responds to e-mail sent to it
> within four weeks). If the consultant doesn't want such an address
> published, then they
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Should we just remove the field, or ask for a new email address that
> is supposed to replace the old one, or ask for a different email
> address that we might keep as comment in consultants.data and we
> might use for checking further requests?
There s
We received a request for removal the email field from a consultants
entry. I am wondering if this is possible at all, since (I believe) we
should retain the email address in order to get in touch with the
consultants, or to verify further requests about the same entry.
Should we just remove the f
6 matches
Mail list logo
