On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 05:41:34PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> Can you tell me where the link checker results file is, once you rerun it?
>
Someone willing to help fix broken links!?
I'm shocked and amazed. I haven't been doing it lately because I got tired
of doing it by myself.
I'll make an
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 10:55:37PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
> > Shouldn't the symlink "2.0", i.e. www.debian.org/2.0, which points to
> > releases/hamm be removed nowadays? I doubt anything links to that page
> > anymore, and hamm is really old now, so it's not quite useful anymore.
>
> Every
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 06:56:00PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shouldn't the symlink "2.0", i.e. www.debian.org/2.0, which points to
> releases/hamm be removed nowadays? I doubt anything links to that page
> anymore, and hamm is really old now, so it's not quite useful anymore.
>
Every ti
Hi,
Shouldn't the symlink "2.0", i.e. www.debian.org/2.0, which points to
releases/hamm be removed nowadays? I doubt anything links to that page
anymore, and hamm is really old now, so it's not quite useful anymore.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
4 matches
Mail list logo
