On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 07:49:18PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 08 April 2007 19:36, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Just about time. Please, can you consider doing this change really
> > soon for www.d.o/CD/ (before we miss the just-released effect) ?
>
> As has been explained to you on IRC a wh
On Sunday 08 April 2007 19:36, Robert Millan wrote:
> Just about time. Please, can you consider doing this change really
> soon for www.d.o/CD/ (before we miss the just-released effect) ?
As has been explained to you on IRC a while back, the multi-arch images
are NOT the "perfect, to be preferre
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:46:16AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:03:34AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > As this page is "owned" and maintained by the d-i project, this mail
> > should have gone to the debian-boot list and not d-cd or d-www.
> > Moving the mail there for pro
Robert Millan wrote:
> What kind of people do you have in mind ? Users of other architectures should
> have a clear idea of what they're looking for.
People for whom a ~500mb netinst is not the best choice of installation
medium, for one.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signa
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 06:24:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > + Multi-arch CD/DVD image for PC or Mac (i386 / amd64 / powerpc)
> > +
> > + Download via HTTP: [ > href="http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/multi-arch/iso-cd/";>CD]
> > [ > href="http
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:03:34AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> As this page is "owned" and maintained by the d-i project, this mail
> should have gone to the debian-boot list and not d-cd or d-www.
> Moving the mail there for proper discussion.
Sorry about that.
Also, I forgot to mention that alth
Frans Pop wrote:
> + Multi-arch CD/DVD image for PC or Mac (i386 / amd64 / powerpc)
> +
> + Download via HTTP: [ href="http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/multi-arch/iso-cd/";>CD]
> [ href="http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/multi-arch/iso-dvd/";>D
As this page is "owned" and maintained by the d-i project, this mail
should have gone to the debian-boot list and not d-cd or d-www.
Moving the mail there for proper discussion.
On Monday 05 March 2007 23:40, Robert Millan wrote:
> I think this is very necessary given how much confusion has been
See attached patch (and screenshot).
I think this is very necessary given how much confusion has been introduced by
amd64 and the intel-mac transition. Users could:
1- Confuse ia64 with amd64 (I've seen that happen, and not precisely with
novice users).
2- Ignore wether their PC suppor
9 matches
Mail list logo
