On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 07:42:32PM +0300, Tommi Vainikainen wrote:
> Anyway, I'm wondering why no ".cvsignore" files are used in
> debian-www's repository. For example listing
> "pseudo-packages.description" in "english/Bugs/.cvsignore" would be
> very normal usage of ".cvsignore" files. Is it ok
On Mon, 28 May 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 07:11:29PM +0300, Tommi Vainikainen wrote:
>> Is there really reasons for this kind of force rebuilds as seen in
>> Bugs/Makefile? Isn't make especially designed for this kind of
>> dependencies?
>
> Notice the line in pseudo
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 07:11:29PM +0300, Tommi Vainikainen wrote:
> Is there really reasons for this kind of force rebuilds as seen in
> Bugs/Makefile? Isn't make especially designed for this kind of
> dependencies?
>
> --- Makefile2000/12/01 21:21:51 1.6
> +++ Makefile2001/05/28 16:
Is there really reasons for this kind of force rebuilds as seen in
Bugs/Makefile? Isn't make especially designed for this kind of
dependencies?
--- Makefile2000/12/01 21:21:51 1.6
+++ Makefile2001/05/28 16:00:46
@@ -11,8 +11,4 @@
$(HTMLFILES): otherpages.inc footer.inc
-# this ne
4 matches
Mail list logo
