Please update https://www.debian.org/ports/

2022-02-09 Thread Jeffrey Walton
Hi Everyone, https://www.debian.org/ports/ is wreaking havoc on unsuspecting users who try to setup a Qemu/Chroot. For example, armhhf is listed as a port but it is no longer a port per [1]. It leads to a lot of problems, like Debian's infamous "Release signed by unknown key (key id E852514F5DF312

Please add link to build logs for a package

2017-05-24 Thread Jeffrey Walton
th (and without bothering the package maintainer). Searching the page for the word "Build" results in 0 hits. Please add another info link that provides the build information. Thank you in advance, Jeffrey Walton Baltimore, MD, US

Bug#828052: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-07-08 Thread Jeffrey Walton
> I think the status field saying "released", "discontinued" etc provides the > information with the current layout. > > Thanks for caring about the ports page. I marked the patches for review (in > my TODO) but couldn't find time :/ > Convert it to a wiki page. The work would have been done we

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 6:18 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 06/25/2016 12:01 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: >> 2. And additionally to the issues mentioned above, it's even worse: >> >>2.1 There are more archs listed as "released", while they got >>removed from Jessie: ia64, kFree

Debian WIki (was: Please update Ports wiki page)

2016-06-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
> 1. Please note that the page is not a wiki, as stated above. That's a good point. Perhaps the wiki page should have a mildly different style to differentiate them. Wiki's are a community effort at documentation, so it makes sense to ensure they are differentiated. Users know they can contribut

Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
The Ports wiki page (https://www.debian.org/ports/) appears to be out of date. Its causing confusion among users and maintainers. For example, a few bugs were reported for Sparc even though Tokarev, a QEMU--static maintainer, states its no longer supported. Spark should probably be labelled as dis

Re: Debian's web page www.debian.org/MailingLists

2016-04-03 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > The number one hit for "Debian Mailing List" is > https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/. Its a good search result. > > The Introduction on the page says: > > Debian is developed through distributed developmen

Re: Debian's web page www.debian.org/MailingLists

2016-02-13 Thread Jeffrey Walton
>> I think it would be better to link [[[mailing lists]]] to >> https://lists.debian.org/completeindex.html because that's the list of >> actual Debian Mailing Lists. Its what I was looking for. > > There is a link to the list of mailing lists already, in the Basic use > section: > > The current l

Debian's web page www.debian.org/MailingLists

2016-02-12 Thread Jeffrey Walton
ople search for Debian Mailing Lists, that's what we are interested in. We should not have to wade through search results looking for the information we precisely called out in a search. Jeffrey Walton Baltimore, MD, US