Bug#790774: [Daniel Kahn Gillmor] https://packages.debian.org/*/*/*/filelist pages ("list of files") are inaccurate

2015-07-01 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: www.debian.org Control: user www.debian@packages.debian.org Control: usertag -1 packages Forwarding this earlier report that i already sent to the mailing list so that it doesn't get lost. You can find the bug report on the mailing list here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2015/

https://packages.debian.org/*/*/*/filelist pages ("list of files") are inaccurate

2015-06-30 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
hi good debian www folks-- i'm e-mailing about two problems with https://packages.debian.org/ because the footer there says: To report a problem with the web site, e-mail debian-www@lists.debian.org. For other contact information, see the Debian contact page. Some files listed twice --

fonts.debian.net proposal -- web fonts

2011-08-25 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
hi Gurkan and the debian fonts team-- What if http://fonts.debian.net/ could generate web font files (in at least the standard eot form, maybe in woff as well) and publish them under a stable URL? If this could be done with a commitment to avoid tracking users (and maybe also to offer it optional

Bug#636785: updates to http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-advocate to welcome non-packaging contributors

2011-08-05 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: www.debian.org Tags: patch On 08/05/2011 12:34 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > >> Any thoughts on how it should be updated to reflect last year's GR? > > Once you have better wording, checkout the webwml CVS a

Re: [Debconf-team] Website related track at next DebConf

2011-02-14 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/14/2011 02:44 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > on the debian-www list we recently spoke about the idea to have a > website related track during DebConf. I don't think it need to be > directly only www.debian.org related, maybe name it "debian.org related > webservices" which can be everything

Re: broken reference in debian security FAQ

2009-02-11 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 02/10/2009 11:03 PM, Matt Kraai wrote: > Thanks for reporting this. The developers' reference is maintained by > the debian-doc team, though, so I'm forwarding this message to them. FWIW, i think the error is in the security FAQ, not in the developers' reference (unless changing the anchor nam

broken reference in debian security FAQ

2009-02-10 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hey good people on debian-www: There is a broken reference in the debian security FAQ. the answer to "Q: What am I supposed to do with a security problem in one of my packages?", here: http://www.debian.org/security/faq#care contains a link to: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-referenc

DSA listings on http://www.debian.org/ are out of date

2008-01-25 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hey debian folks on the security and web teams-- Looking at http://www.debian.org/ today (2008-01-25), i noticed that the security section of the home page is out of date. I only lists through DSA 1467, which is nearly a week old at this point. There are 10 more-recent DSAs missing from the list

http://www.debian.org/ is reporting .dot files as application/msword instead of text/x-graphviz

2006-03-18 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
The recent report of the outcome of GR2006-001 [0] contains a visual graph of the results. Clicking on the graph returns the source for the image [1], which is a text file for use with 'dot' (part of the graphviz package [2]). However, the web server suggests that the source's mime-type is 'appli