On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:07:00 +0200
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's probably a wrong example :
> * The wiki already have such pages (see InstallingDebianOn).
> * We (you, me and the users) don't want to have multiples page on
> the wiki to report hardware howtos.
> * Those pages
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:13:52 +0200
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 18:34 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:02:43 +0200
> > Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > So to make it short : Y
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:02:43 +0200
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Contribution/comments/review of the pages [3] and [4] are welcome.
>
> [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/LicencingTerms
> [2] http://bugs.debian.org/385797
> [3] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/LicencingTerms/Pr
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:02:43 +0200
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
>
> So to make it short : You can create a "book" on our wiki, with a
> specific license. Also, you are welcome to review the page [3] and
> [4].
Is there anyway to make sub-pages also automatically ha
Is there anything a non-DD can do to help get the debian wiki licensing
mess straightened out? I'd like to help, but I'm not a DD.
Also, I'd like to point out that this is something that I'm going to
have to set up a separate wiki because of, because the current wiki
situation doesn't allow for m
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
The link http://wiki.debian.org/copyright.html (which is supposed to
point to the copyright notice) linked from
http://wiki.debian.org/About does not exist. Also, as with
www.debian.org a link to the license should be at the bottom of, at
least, the front
6 matches
Mail list logo