Re: preparing the upgrade of www-master to bookworm: issues building the bullseye release notes (fonts-sil-charis)

Hi all, Am 29. September 2024 21:54:27 MESZ schrieb Paul Gevers : >Hi, > >On 29-09-2024 14:40, Thomas Lange wrote: >> I would be happy if you could decide what you want to do. Keep the PDF >> versions (with or without updating them) or remove building the PDFs? >> Currently this discussion seems t

Re: favicon.ico on packges.debian.org

在 2024-01-12五的 11:18 +0900，Nick Hastings写道： > Hi, > > http://packages.debian.org suggests emailing this list for problems with > that web site. > > I noticed that packages.debian.org uses a different favicon.ico to that > of www.debian.org. The reason that I noticed is because the > packages.debi

Re: preparing the upgrade of www-master to bookworm: issues building the bullseye release notes (fonts-sil-charis)

Hi, On 29-09-2024 14:40, Thomas Lange wrote: I would be happy if you could decide what you want to do. Keep the PDF versions (with or without updating them) or remove building the PDFs? Currently this discussion seems to be stalled and I like to move forward. How likes to decide this? debian-doc

Re: preparing the upgrade of www-master to bookworm: issues building the bullseye release notes (fonts-sil-charis)

Hi, I would be happy if you could decide what you want to do. Keep the PDF versions (with or without updating them) or remove building the PDFs? Currently this discussion seems to be stalled and I like to move forward. How likes to decide this? debian-doc or release team? IMO the release notes fo