Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 07:38:44 +
with message-id <20190310073844.ga19...@tack.einval.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#924164: Don't say use Jigdo
has caused the Debian Bug report #924164,
regarding Don't say use Jigdo
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Sat, Mar 09 2019, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> ...snip...
> point, as Python 2 is on the way out.
Well i'm not position to resolve it. However that is very very very
dangerous i think. Anyhow, it is interesting PR, to me.
Sincerely, Byung-Hee.
--
Still i'm waiting for Debian 11 -- ^Bullseye_^))/
Hi Axel,
Axel Beckert (2018-12-25):
> wml package maintainer here.
>
> For multiple Debian releases I've kept newer WML releases in
> experimental as they crashed rather often with my own WML based
> projects.
>
> I recently uploaded 2.10.1 to experimental which seems to work
> identical to 2.0
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: scripts
Hi,
While working on rebuilding the website within stretch and buster, I've
noticed the following.
This is a curated summary based on diffing a stretch build tree and a
buster build tree, after bu
Package: www.debian.org
On https://www.debian.org/CD/jigdo-cd :
See my comment at the end of bug #639937. Jigdo will not build 100%
correct CDs due to the index files often not being in 100% sync. So please
don't recommend it as a way to download Debian CDs. Else one will take
such CD to some rem
Well all I know is we think they must be in contrast to the other items
listed.
> "HW" == Holger Wansing writes:
HW> Hi,
HW> 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
>> Package: www.debian.org
>>
>> On https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
>> After "Current daily snapshots" say
>> "netinst multi-a
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: scripts
Hi,
While working on rebuilding the website within stretch and buster, I've
noticed the following.
Tracking down another issue, I've spotted that one particular language has an
inc file that appe
Cyril Brulebois (2019-03-09):
> When building on buster, the Perl upgrade changes at least one thing:
> one needs to install an extra package to get the Locale::Codes module.
For completeness, the error message:
ePerl:Error: Perl runtime error (interpreter rc=0)
Contents of STD
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: scripts
Hi,
While working on rebuilding the website within stretch and buster, I've
noticed the following.
Setting up a minimal chroot with dependencies from the metapackage, the
GD perl module cannot be
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: scripts
Hi,
While working on rebuilding the website within stretch and buster, I've
noticed the following.
When building on buster, the Perl upgrade changes at least one thing:
one needs to install an ext
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: scripts
Hi,
While working on rebuilding the website within stretch and buster, I've
noticed the following.
It was a bit surprising to see that many errors, either due to missing
dependencies, or missing d
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: scripts
Hi,
While working on rebuilding the website within stretch and buster, I've
noticed the following.
There are a couple of scripts that rely on Python at the moment:
$ find -name '*.py'|sort
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: scripts
Hi,
While working on rebuilding the website within stretch and buster, I've
noticed the following.
The README only mentions a couple of packages, along with a link to the
debian.org meta package f
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: scripts
Hi,
While working on rebuilding the website within stretch and buster, I've
noticed the following.
The metapackage (in debian.org.git) doesn't mention either python or
python-lxml, but both are ne
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: www.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: scripts
Hi,
While working on rebuilding the website within stretch and buster, I've
noticed the following.
There are many leftovers from CVS times in the tree, namely .cvsignore
files:
$ find -name .
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 19:09:41 +0100,
Holger Wansing wrote:
>Hi,
>
>積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
>> Package: www.debian.org
>>
>> On https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
>> After "Current daily snapshots" say
>> "netinst multi-arch CD images"
>> Not just
>> "multi-arch CD images".
>>
>
>The
Hi,
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
>
> On https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
> users see:
> "other images (netboot, USB stick, etc.)"
>
> But in fact many of the other places above and below that can also be
> used for USB sticks. In fact they are the more primary
Hi,
積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
>
> On https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
> After "Current daily snapshots" say
> "netinst multi-arch CD images"
> Not just
> "multi-arch CD images".
>
The "multi-arch CD images" is - as first - the definition of a group of imag
Hi all
El 9/3/19 a las 19:00, Holger Wansing escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> it came to my attention, that apparently there are two repositories for
> debian-history at salsa:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/project-history
> https://salsa.debian.org/publicity-team/debian-history
>
> Or am I miss
Hi all,
it came to my attention, that apparently there are two repositories for
debian-history at salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/project-history
https://salsa.debian.org/publicity-team/debian-history
Or am I missing something?
Looking at the commit history, it seems that the former is
Your message dated Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:48:15 +
with message-id <5c83fc5f1c2c7_37c2b1f7ecdf0dc67...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug #924091 in www.debian.org fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #924091,
regarding www.debian.org: News/2019/20190308.wml points to www.debian.org using
HTTP in
Your message dated Sat, 09 Mar 2019 17:20:34 +
with message-id <5c83f5e22b1b1_37c2b1f7ecdf0dc66...@godard.mail>
and subject line Bug #924120 in www.debian.org fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #924120,
regarding Say "netinst multi-arch CD images"
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: www.debian.org
On https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
users see:
"other images (netboot, USB stick, etc.)"
But in fact many of the other places above and below that can also be
used for USB sticks. In fact they are the more primary places...
Package: www.debian.org
On https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
After "Current daily snapshots" say
"netinst multi-arch CD images"
Not just
"multi-arch CD images".
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainers,
Page News/2019/20190308.wml, as of commit
ce517877a62210aca2c6dcfa4431f2ccb43c22da, points, in the "Contact
Information" section, to www.debian.org using http://. I guess it should
use https:// instead.
Regards,
Rafa.
signature.asc
De
25 matches
Mail list logo
