> On Sun, 5 Aug 2018 06:40:23 +0100, Steve McIntyre said:
> Definitely it should stay - a major part of the usefulness of many
> pages is "can I trust this to be up to date?". If desired, I'm happy
That's excatly what I tried to accomplish. Either remove it or have
the correct informa
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 05:51:36AM +0200, Thomas Lange wrote:
>
>In the long run we may be able to read the git logs and have the
>accurate information of the 'last modification'. Currently that does
>not seem to be possible, because the build already takes too long.
That's actually one of the bit
On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 07:32:17PM +0200, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
>>
>>The last commit on index.wml was in 2014, which only changed http to
>>https, so no real content change. In fact, the content didn't changed
>>since 2012 and may be out of date.
>
>The content is current.
>
>>Please just remov
> On Sat, 04 Aug 2018 19:32:17 +0200, Laura Arjona Reina
> said:
> The content is current.
That's good.
> The date shown is the date of last build. This can be the date when
something changed in the page (content or layout), in the templates used to
build that page (e.g. a cha
El 4 de agosto de 2018 19:32:17 CEST, Laura Arjona Reina
escribió:
>
>We probably change the string
I wanted to say: we probably should change the string...
Kind regards
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail
Hello Thomas
El 4 de agosto de 2018 17:23:06 CEST, Thomas Lange
escribió:
>
>Package: www.debian.org
>
>In the footer of every page we list the date the page was last
>modified. Currently this information is completly useless, because it
>does not show a correct date. e.g.
>
>https://www.debian.
Package: www.debian.org
In the footer of every page we list the date the page was last
modified. Currently this information is completly useless, because it
does not show a correct date. e.g.
https://www.debian.org/women/
Last Modified: Fri, Jun 1 18:42:17 UTC 2018
Let's look into the git log
On 08/04/2018 08:04 AM, Thomas Lange wrote:
Just an information how fedora cleaned up and reorganized their web
pages. JFTR in case we want to do the same in the far future.
https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-docs-overhaul/
That link could be valuable in the near term also for the links contai
Just an information how fedora cleaned up and reorganized their web
pages. JFTR in case we want to do the same in the far future.
https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-docs-overhaul/
--
regards Thomas
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> New Debian Policy has updated Debian's FHS version from v2.3 to v3.0. The
> corresponding FHS version under www.debian.org needs to be updated too.
Since it is plausible this could change again, it would be nice to not
hard-code the version num
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> The links yield error 404.
>
> Please fix the links by removing the trailing .gz. The files are there
> but uncompressed .pdf and .txt.
This appears to have been fixed now, the FHS links are still broken though.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear debian website developers,
New Debian Policy has updated Debian's FHS version from v2.3 to v3.0. The
corresponding FHS version under www.debian.org needs to be updated too.
https://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#policy
--
Regards,
Boyuan Yang
-
Hello!
I noticed the section https://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#policy
contains links to the pdf and txt version of Debian policy.
The links yield error 404.
Please fix the links by removing the trailing .gz. The files are there
but uncompressed .pdf and .txt.
- Otto
13 matches
Mail list logo
