Re: Hexagonal sticker with the debian swirl

2016-06-25 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla''
On 2016-06-21 at 22:40:25 +0200, Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi wrote: > In the IRC conversation it was also mentioned that the sticker could be > then submitted to http://hexb.in/ : I would be happy to do it, but I > would prefer it there was already a canonical location for the files to > point to

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 6:18 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 06/25/2016 12:01 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: >> 2. And additionally to the issues mentioned above, it's even worse: >> >>2.1 There are more archs listed as "released", while they got >>removed from Jessie: ia64, kFree

Debian WIki (was: Please update Ports wiki page)

2016-06-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
> 1. Please note that the page is not a wiki, as stated above. That's a good point. Perhaps the wiki page should have a mildly different style to differentiate them. Wiki's are a community effort at documentation, so it makes sense to ensure they are differentiated. Users know they can contribut

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Holger Wansing wrote: >2.4 In german translation (maybe others too) for arm64 and ppc64el, >there seems to be an archicture name missing in the release-notes: >the headline says >"Hinweise zur Debian-Veröffentlichung Version 8 (Jessie) auf " >(missing the

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 06/25/2016 12:18 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 06/25/2016 12:01 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: >> 2. And additionally to the issues mentioned above, it's even worse: >> >>2.1 There are more archs listed as "released", while they got >>removed from Jessie: ia64, kFreeBSD 64-bit

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 06/25/2016 12:01 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: > 2. And additionally to the issues mentioned above, it's even worse: > >2.1 There are more archs listed as "released", while they got >removed from Jessie: ia64, kFreeBSD 64-bit, kFreeBSD 32-bit, >s390, and the already mentioned s

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > The Ports wiki page (https://www.debian.org/ports/) appears to be out > > of date. Its causing confusion among users and maintainers. For > > example, a few bugs were reported for Sparc even though Tokarev, a > >

Bug#364913: How to set up a page with gettext (cf. #364913)

2016-06-25 Thread victory
you can do these as www-team: * add definitions in a file such as english/vote/vote.defs * add its reference to vote_FILES in english/po/Makefile * run something like, make -C english/po pot * need to run update-vote.[short-lang].po in each [language]/po directory to sync translations secretar

Re: Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > The Ports wiki page (https://www.debian.org/ports/) appears to be out > of date. Its causing confusion among users and maintainers. For > example, a few bugs were reported for Sparc even though Tokarev, a > QEMU--static maintainer, states it

Please update Ports wiki page

2016-06-25 Thread Jeffrey Walton
The Ports wiki page (https://www.debian.org/ports/) appears to be out of date. Its causing confusion among users and maintainers. For example, a few bugs were reported for Sparc even though Tokarev, a QEMU--static maintainer, states its no longer supported. Spark should probably be labelled as dis