Re: Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:16:39 +0100 Tomas Pospisek wrote: > Am 12.02.2015 um 20:59 schrieb Riley Baird: > > > Bug #388141 [RC] refers to the relicensing of the debian www pages. > > After contacting debian-www, it seems that there isn't much interest in > > fixing it. > > I interpret the relative

Fw: Re: Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:47:53 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2015, Riley Baird wrote: > > In any case, even if there is interest in closing this bug, it is > > definitely more of a long-term thing and is unlikely to be fixed before > > the jessie release. Because of this, would it be o

Re: Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?

On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:40:53 + "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > On 2015-02-12 19:59, Riley Baird wrote: > > In any case, even if there is interest in closing this bug, it is > > definitely more of a long-term thing and is unlikely to be fixed before > > the jessie release. Because of this, would it

Re: Should we mark #388141 as jessie-ignore?

On 2015-02-12 19:59, Riley Baird wrote: In any case, even if there is interest in closing this bug, it is definitely more of a long-term thing and is unlikely to be fixed before the jessie release. Because of this, would it be okay to mark it as "jessie-ignore"? For reference, as per https://ww