On Ma, 16 oct 12, 14:36:12, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> Your other suggestions for anti-spam are common suggestions, but (in
> my opinion) not likely to work. Rate limits are difficult to enforce
> with spamming scum using bots located all over the world to create
> random pages; moderation is very
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:36:12 +0100
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> I agree, reCaptcha is suboptimal but the alternative is for the wiki
> >> team (1.5 persons) to revert lots of spam daily instead of one or two
> >> per week. If you have an anti-spam mechanism that is as effective as
> >> reCaptcha th
MJ Ray wrote:
>Paul Wise
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:28 PM, MJ Ray wrote:
>>
>> > This is a bug. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678540
>>
>> I agree, reCaptcha is suboptimal but the alternative is for the wiki
>> team (1.5 persons) to revert lots of spam daily instead of one
Paul Wise
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:28 PM, MJ Ray wrote:
>
> > This is a bug. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678540
>
> I agree, reCaptcha is suboptimal but the alternative is for the wiki
> team (1.5 persons) to revert lots of spam daily instead of one or two
> per week. If
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:28 PM, MJ Ray wrote:
> This is a bug. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678540
I agree, reCaptcha is suboptimal but the alternative is for the wiki
team (1.5 persons) to revert lots of spam daily instead of one or two
per week. If you have an anti-spam me
Paul Wise
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Francesco Potortì wrote:
>
> > There is a field named "ReCaptcha (required)" without any picture or
> > input field. And I am refused subscription because I entered no captcha.
>
> It is likely that you will need to enable JavaScript, accept
> third
6 matches
Mail list logo
