Dear Sir.
I have a few questions about debian installation.
Already I installed debian 5.0.2 in serveral other PC a few month ago. And
there is no problem to install debain 5.0.2.
But I recently tried to install the debian in another PC. When downloading
from FTP mirror site, I think t
Le Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 11:17:02PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
>
> I'm under the *impression* that an important amount of people objecting
> copyright assignments do so to avoid the risk that their contributions
> get re-licensed under terms that go against their moral beliefs about
> soft
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:40:35PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> I think that this is exactly what people opposing to copyright
> assignment want to avoid: giving permission to re-license under yet
> unknown terms.
I don't think you should make absolute statements for *all* the people
opposing co
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:15:03 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[...]
> A possible way out, that I'm hereby suggesting, is to ask for the right
> to re-license (instead of copyright assignment), but to ask a blanket
> permission to re-license under any DFSG-free license the -www team will
> see fit, n
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:38:24PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Recent discussions on bug #388141 [1] (starting at message #206),
> include a plan to ask for copyright assignments to SPI from all future
> and (then) past contributors.
> I think this is the wrong approach.
>
> The Debian Project
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 21:50:17 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:38:24PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Secondly, the web site claims [3] to be copyrighted by SPI, while it's
> > not [5].
>
> As a side point: the above claim of yours is no longer true, see
> #632175. The
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> As MJ Ray pointed out, also on my Samsung Galaxy search box and download
> box overlap the logos but apart from that the page looks a big
> improvement.
> IMHO we could create a mobile.css in which remove the left and right
> margi
Hello!
I see there's (at last) some activity on bug #388141 [1].
I am happy to see that, but I personally think it's going in a slightly
wrong direction... :-(
First of all, a brief summary of bug #238245 [2] and of bug #388141 [1]
(which started as a clone of #238245 [2]), for debian-legal read
Hi,
Le 04/01/2012 07:20, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:56:48PM -0400, David Prévot a écrit :
>>
>> We could contact every current contributor, and ask them if they are OK to:
>> - grant copyright of their future contributions to SPI;
>> - grant copyright of their past contr
Le 08/01/2012 05:39, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:06:54PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> I remembered that I had intended to start a discussion about this.
First of all, thanks for working on that.
>> Move the page to a more prominent location, perhaps /derivatives?
> [
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 01:06:54PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Recently we got a query[4] about how to add a distribution to [1] and
> I remembered that I had intended to start a discussion about this.
Thanks!
> Move the page to a more prominent location, perhaps /derivatives?
Yep, agreed. For on
While I mostly agree with every point, I do have something specific to add:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> * distributes source for all the FOSS software it distributes; I
> plan to write some code to check for that the source and binary
> package lists from
12 matches
Mail list logo
