[ Copy to listmaster: http://lists.debian.org/ is not in the web team
hands. ]
Le 04/01/2012 20:08, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:30:36PM +, Raf Czlonka a écrit :
>>
>> Even if everyone, e.g. Debian, mail-archive, etc. obfuscated the email
>> addresses in the headers, y
Thanks for your answer and lecture, Raf. I never gave permission to publish
my email address on a public webpage. I don't want spam bots to find my
email address. And I don't have anything to do with this mailing list.
There are no other sites on the internet where this email address is
published,
Le Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:30:36PM +, Raf Czlonka a écrit :
>
> Even if everyone, e.g. Debian, mail-archive, etc. obfuscated the email
> addresses in the headers, you just made sure that your email address
> will never be removed/obfuscated in such a way as you put your it in the
> body of THI
n 04, 2012 at 04:13:42PM GMT, Ellen W. wrote:
> Dear Sir / Madam,
>
> By searching in Google, I found my email address (zeepv...@gmail.com)
> at
> the following public page:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-german/2008/12/msg00919.html
>
> In order to reduce spam, I would like to hide my email
Hi,
On page http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ there is a link
http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html.
Destination is broken, I get:
alioth.debian.org uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not t
=
"-- Esta é uma mensagem gerada automaticamente pela caixa postal de
gmmarketingmultini...@gmail.com Não há necessidade de respondê-la"
A POLISHOP LANÇA SEU NOVO CANAL DE NEGÓCIOS
Olá, tudo bem?
A maior empresa mu
Dear Sir / Madam,
By searching in Google, I found my email address (zeepv...@gmail.com) at
the following public page:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-german/2008/12/msg00919.html
In order to reduce spam, I would like to hide my email address. Could you
remove this page or my email address fro
David Prévot
> If they refuse to grant copyright of their future contributions to SPI,
> or if they don't respond, the first action would be to remove their
> commit access, so starting at 2012, all the new content of the
> website will be copyright SPI.
That seems a bad situation in two ways: 1
David Prévot writes:
> I don't know what would be the best approach for future contributors
> (i.e. I don't know if we'll need to ask them explicitly for their
> consent, or if a page on our website would be enough), but for current
> and past contributors, we need their consent.
>
> We could cont
Le Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:56:48PM -0400, David Prévot a écrit :
>
> We could contact every current contributor, and ask them if they are OK to:
> - grant copyright of their future contributions to SPI;
> - grant copyright of their past contributions to SPI.
>
…
>
> Unless someone objects on th
Good day, my gentleman!
The person who tries to live alone will not succeed as a human being. His
heart withers if it does not answer another heart. His mind shrinks away
if he hears only the echoes of his own thoughts and finds no other
inspiration.
It would be so easy for you to lift me to Sevent
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:56:48PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Once the copyright granted to SPI, it will be a lot easier to address
> the licensing issue, but I would prefer not to take care of everything
> at once (given past experience, trying to do everything at once is
> doomed to fail): this
12 matches
Mail list logo
