Hi MJ!
You wrote:
> > This was talked about in
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2007/04/msg00150.html; it seemed to
> > me that the consensus was SVN, but whatever way we decide to go,
> > someone needs to fix the tools to do it before switching becomes a
> > viable option.
>
> Four replie
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This was talked about in
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2007/04/msg00150.html; it seemed to
> > me that the consensus was SVN, but whatever way we decide to go,
> > someone needs to fix the tools to do it befo
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ links to
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/ on "current weekly
snapshot of Debian testing", but these
images aren't current currently, dating from May.
There are current netinst and businesscar
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 04:32:24PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
Hi Jens,
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 01:36:54PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > There's more in favour of git in that thread, including CVS emulation,
>
> I would also like to switch to git but the reason is a little bit
> different: I just don
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 01:36:54PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> There's more in favour of git in that thread, including CVS emulation,
I would also like to switch to git but the reason is a little bit
different: I just don't know it (have experiences with CVS and know SVN
very well, also a little bit da
Hello
I found the link to http://manpages.debian.net/cgi-bin/search_man.cgi on
the page http://www.debian.org/doc/todo#ideas to be dead. The server
http://manpages.debian.net works as it displays the default Apache notice.
Regards,
M.V. Wesstein
the Netherlands
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was talked about in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2007/04/msg00150.html; it seemed to
> me that the consensus was SVN, but whatever way we decide to go,
> someone needs to fix the tools to do it before switching becomes a
> viable option.
Four
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 10:49:13PM -0400, James Treacy wrote:
> Hello all,
> I was not alone in not being completely happy with the second version
> of the developer map so I bit the bullet and wrote my own program to
> aggregate high concentrations of developers. The results can be found
> in http
8 matches
Mail list logo