Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:56:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#137839: www.debian.org: i386 port could mention some
supported processors
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:44:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#136725: debian-devel-announce should mention "man
apt_preferences"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:36:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#127849: GIF images still in use
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
reassign 130325 lists.debian.org
retitle 130325 lists.debian.org pages don't show swirl favicon
thanks
Hi Cesar!
You wrote:
> www.debian.org has a favicon. qa.debian.org, db.debian.org and probably others
> do not (as far as I've been able to determine -- I only looked at those two).
Afaics, al
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 130325 lists.debian.org
Bug#130325: www.debian.org: favicon missing in some domains
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `lists.debian.org'.
> retitle 130325 lists.debian.org pages don't show swirl favicon
Bug#130325: www.debian.org
Hi Kevin!
You wrote:
> Hi. I think it'd be just swell if you could search packages.debian.org
> and the bugs database through the 'Search' sidebar in Mozilla. And, in
> fact, one can without too much effort. (See attatched Sherlock
> extension files.) But it would work even BETTER with just a
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:47:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364896: make new maintainer corner clearer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Simon Paillard wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:58:22AM +0200, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
There is a request in the bts [1] to show which mirrors are reachable
over IPv6. I've already added a new field "IPv6" to the mirror
master
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:58:22AM +0200, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
>
> > There is a request in the bts [1] to show which mirrors are reachable
> > over IPv6. I've already added a new field "IPv6" to the mirror
> > masterlist [2], but Simon Paillard sug
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Hi!
There is a request in the bts [1] to show which mirrors are reachable
over IPv6. I've already added a new field "IPv6" to the mirror
masterlist [2], but Simon Paillard suggested on irc that that might not
be the best solution, because there could,
10 matches
Mail list logo