Samedi 2 septembre 2006, 00:49:51 CEST, Jens Seidel a écrit :
>
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:08:56AM +0200, Sylvain Sauvage wrote:
> > it seems there is a problem with content language negotiation on
> > www.debian.org (and also mirrors, like www.fr.debian.org): although my
>
> n
Hi Sylvain,
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:08:56AM +0200, Sylvain Sauvage wrote:
> it seems there is a problem with content language negotiation on
> www.debian.org (and also mirrors, like www.fr.debian.org): although my
no, I don't think so, but there is a problem with Konqueror which
currently fail
Hi,
it seems there is a problem with content language negotiation on
www.debian.org (and also mirrors, like www.fr.debian.org): although my
client declares it accepts "fr, en" (so French first), I only get english
pages. Even if I select the french page, following a link leads me to an
english one
On Friday 01 September 2006 23:09, Tim Wilson-Brown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Your front page (http://www.debian.org/) says two things which seem
> contradictory:
>
> "The latest stable release of Debian is 3.1. The last update to this
> release was made on April 19th, 2006."
>
> and
>
> "[01 Sep 2006] Debi
Hi,
Your front page (http://www.debian.org/) says two things which seem
contradictory:
"The latest stable release of Debian is 3.1. The last update to this
release was made on April 19th, 2006."
and
"[01 Sep 2006] Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 updated"
Is this correct?
Tim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 363493 many links to source packages in sarge updates (3.1r1, r2, r3)
> broken
Bug#363493: www.debian.org: many links to source packages in sarge updates
(3.1r1, r2) broken
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:43:14AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/News/2006/20060901
> is dated "April 19th, 2006", and points to
> http://release.debian.org/stable/3.1/3.1r2/
>
> Looks like somebody was a little too quick with
> the cut-and-
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.01.1843 +0200]:
> http://www.debian.org/News/2006/20060901
> is dated "April 19th, 2006", and points to
> http://release.debian.org/stable/3.1/3.1r2/
>
> Looks like somebody was a little too quick with
>
http://www.debian.org/News/2006/20060901
is dated "April 19th, 2006", and points to
http://release.debian.org/stable/3.1/3.1r2/
Looks like somebody was a little too quick with
the cut-and-paste.
I hope you can correct this soon, before you get flooded
with emails like this. Maybe it&
Hi!
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:18:28PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 11:09:09PM +0200, Stephan Fuhrmann wrote:
> > > this one http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#quick-reference
> > >
> > > seems to be broken on all web servers (404, not found) for al
10 matches
Mail list logo