Your message dated Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:23:57 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291188: www.debian.org: ports/amd64/ mentions to be most
complete after i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Vladimir Vesselinov wrote:
> very hard to find the text or program
> here I need 2hr to find this...
Try using synaptic or another frontend, they're easier if you don't know what
you're looking for, see section editors. Also of interest might be
http://packages.debian.org/stable/editors/.
> c
very hard to find the text or program
here I need 2hr to find this...
not good for this web site...
Friends
comme the time for STANDARD for software and OS
Microsoft - Windows ** XP --- have the STANDARD and with this
point they are FIRST
I like Linux but he need STANDARD
vladimir
--
To
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 17:02, SUGIYAMA Tomoaki wrote:
> Hi, I thought that "exploition" might have to be "exploitation" in
> webwml/english/security/2005/dsa-646.wml. If so, please fix it.
>
> By the way, there seems to be "exploition" also in dsa-629.wml.
Both are fixed now, thanks.
--
Hi,
I have some troubles with search.d.o: links ask me what I want to do
with the document whose type is unknown (application/x-trash). Mime type
seems to be wrong. Could someone check this please? or explain how I
can search on this site if I'm wrong.
Nicolas Bertolissio
--
signature.asc
De
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: D-I Manual on official Debian website
Date: Wednesday 19 January 2005 16:08
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:55:20PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On January 6 I have send [1
Oganization type: non-profit
This organization have one workstation and i choose Debian because it's
the best for newbie like me
--
Bruno de Souza Silva
Linux User #378976
gnupgID: 533AFA74
MSN - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi, I thought that "exploition" might have to be "exploitation" in
webwml/english/security/2005/dsa-646.wml. If so, please fix it.
By the way, there seems to be "exploition" also in dsa-629.wml.
regards,
--
SUGIYAMA Tomoaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:55:01AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:42:02PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > This also applies for the download table, it is much longer than before
>
> Huh? The download table is the only that that didn't change at all...
Ok, I realised
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
The webpage http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ mentions in paragraph three
"Taking the ported source packages count, debian-amd64 is the most complete
port after i386, see the Buildd stats."
But looking at the picture linked, powerpc is more complete too,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 12:34:58AM +0100, Jutta Wrage wrote:
>
> Am Dienstag, 18.01.05 um 14:58 Uhr schrieb Frank Lichtenheld:
>
> >What a Accept header is you browser sending? Mine sends
> >Accept:
> >text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/
> >plain;q=0.8,image/pn
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:08:17PM +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote:
> In a recent comment[1], there was an underlying complaint that the security
> RSS feeds are hard to find since they are not linked from the front page,
> even though they are linked from the security page. Since the latest DSAs
>
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:42:02PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:23:48AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > What do you think about something like
> > http://packages.debian.net/unstable/graphics/scribus ? I replaced the
> > [dep] string with the image and put the [dep]
13 matches
Mail list logo
