Origin of Debian Whirlpool not found.

2003-05-29 Thread Kang Jeong-Hee
Hi. KLDP, http://kldp.org/ has introduced a number of T-shirts including one of debian whirlpool marked. I purchased one, to give someone a present. But I coulnd't describe the meaning of, and the origin of Debian Whirlpool logo. I myself don't use Debian and the person who'll get this present do

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by tbm: webwml/english/intro organization.data

2003-05-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 10:54:20PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > I think I'm starting to get increasingly bored with all this blather > about publicising the internal projects. What's the difference between an "internal project" and "stuff we're doing", anyway? It's always sounded distressingly like

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by tbm: webwml/english/intro organization.data

2003-05-29 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 10:17:59PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 05:18:00PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > You forgot the `make pot` in english/po (like everyone else does > > everytime :) > > Cannot some kind of script be added to run it automatically when

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by tbm: webwml/english/intro organization.data

2003-05-29 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 10:30:39PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 05:18:00PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > While doing this I found out that the descriptions of the internal > > projects are missing the domain="" attribute. I don't believe this is > > intentional? > > Sp

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by tbm: webwml/english/intro organization.data

2003-05-29 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 10:30:39PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > Modified files: > > > english/intro : organization.data > > > > > > Log message: > > > Add a list of Debian Internal Projects. Patch provided by Andreas > > > Tille, > > > thanks. Closes: #189072 > > > > You forgot the

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by tbm: webwml/english/intro organization.data

2003-05-29 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 05:18:00PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Modified files: > > english/intro : organization.data > > > > Log message: > > Add a list of Debian Internal Projects. Patch provided by Andreas > > Tille, > > thanks. Closes: #189072 > > You forgot the `make

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by tbm: webwml/english/intro organization.data

2003-05-29 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 05:18:00PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 05:59:24AM -0600, Debian WWW CVS wrote: > > Modified files: > > english/intro : organization.data > > > > Log message: > > Add a list of Debian Internal Projects. Patch provided by Andreas > >

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by tbm: webwml/english/intro organization.data

2003-05-29 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 05:59:24AM -0600, Debian WWW CVS wrote: > Modified files: > english/intro : organization.data > > Log message: > Add a list of Debian Internal Projects. Patch provided by Andreas > Tille, > thanks. Closes: #189072 You forgot the `make pot` in english

Farmaplanet - News 012/2003

2003-05-29 Thread Farmaplanet.it
 29 Maggio 2003        Arriva l'estate... scegli tra i nostri prodotti...   solari per il corpo    solari per il viso   thekoa St. Barth Vichy gli olii preziosi Lierac   dai Caraibi per te...   scopri la novità... e moltissime altre linee... Angstr

Bug#189072: marked as done (www.debian.org: Please add Debian internal projects to organisation page)

2003-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 29 May 2003 22:03:35 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line applied has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Re: lurker + debian

2003-05-29 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 10:08:18PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 01:50:37AM +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: > > Let me briefly outline why lurker has one mailbox per list: > [...] > > For these reasons I consider the new scheme to be superior from a usability > > and robustne