Re: [roybryant@seventwentyfour.com: Broken link in www.hk.debian.org]

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:09:32PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Somebody may want to correct this. Fixed in CVS now and on the web site soon. -- Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux Peon

Re: Require installation of two libraries

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small) writes: > Could you either install mnogosearch-pgsql and mnogosearch-common, > found at ~csmall/builds Done. P.S. Craig and other WWW folks: debconf on klecker got fux0red recently and I had to purge, reinstall and do dpkg-reconfigure --all, which means a) some th

Require installation of two libraries

Hello Debian Admins, I have been testing the new version of mnogosearch (3.2.10) on klecker and I believe that it is ready for deployment. If you want to play, you can go to http://search.debian.org/new/index2.cgi You wll see that it is a small script that runs index2a.cgi The script is needed

[roybryant@seventwentyfour.com: Broken link in www.hk.debian.org]

Somebody may want to correct this. Regards, Joey - Forwarded message from "Roy at SEVENtwentyfour Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 20:40:29 -0400 From: "Roy at SEVENtwentyfour Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Broken link in www.hk.debi

Re: a question about list archives

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-05-14 23:02]: > I am writing to ask if there is any way to have an archive and thread removed > from the list. No, this is not done. Please read the disclaimer for the lists about it: Have fun, Alfie -- > Wozu ein Forum

Processed: Wrong Bug tagged

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 193239 - fixed Bug#193239: search box on http://www.debian.org/ broken Tags were: fixed Tags removed: fixed > tags 193237 + fixed Bug#193237: sbcl: Core-file search. Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#193106: bugs.debian.org: what defaults on /Bugs page?

>> However, the results produced act like all the "Include severity" >> boxes were checked. So why aren't they initially checked when the >> user encounters them? C> Because it would produce a most vomitously long URL. Not checking any of C> the include/exclude boxes is a useful edge case, and is