debian-www您好!大船过海!!!

2002-10-27 Thread 徐嘉临
深圳市新联美术印刷有限公司 本公司成立十余年,承蒙社会各界人士的厚爱,发扬"以诚为本""团结拼搏""科技创新""不断进取"的企业精神,跨入深圳十强印刷企业。 本公司引进全新日本小森四色机,拥有世界最先进的西德进口电脑遥控罗兰四色彩印机,采用最先进电脑设计排版系统为客户提供设计、印刷、装订一条龙优质服务,以质量好,价格优,交货快,信誉佳,送货上门的服务宗旨赢得广大客户的信赖。 本公司业务范围:精美画册彩页书刊、产品说明书、宣传海报、手提纸袋、吊牌、酒标、不干胶贴、信笺信封、表格单据、挂历、台历、包装彩盒等。 本公司曾与TCL王牌、中兴通讯、华为集团、茂业百货、外国语学院、创维集团、中国电信

listarchives您好!大船过海!!!

2002-10-27 Thread 徐嘉临
深圳市新联美术印刷有限公司 本公司成立十余年,承蒙社会各界人士的厚爱,发扬"以诚为本""团结拼搏""科技创新""不断进取"的企业精神,跨入深圳十强印刷企业。 本公司引进全新日本小森四色机,拥有世界最先进的西德进口电脑遥控罗兰四色彩印机,采用最先进电脑设计排版系统为客户提供设计、印刷、装订一条龙优质服务,以质量好,价格优,交货快,信誉佳,送货上门的服务宗旨赢得广大客户的信赖。 本公司业务范围:精美画册彩页书刊、产品说明书、宣传海报、手提纸袋、吊牌、酒标、不干胶贴、信笺信封、表格单据、挂历、台历、包装彩盒等。 本公司曾与TCL王牌、中兴通讯、华为集团、茂业百货、外国语学院、创维集团、中国电信

Re: redirect.pl sez Content-Type: application/x-perl

2002-10-27 Thread Lou Poppler
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Josip Rodin wrote: > > If it can't be removed, maybe it could instead say: > > Content-Type: text/html > > Hmm, you're right, I suppose it should do that. Maybe an even smarter thing > would be to ditch the redirect script and just use a server redirect. One possibility that

Re: redirect.pl sez Content-Type: application/x-perl

2002-10-27 Thread Andrew Shugg
Josip Rodin said: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:07:46PM -0400, Lou Poppler wrote: > > > > This script produces a 302 redirect response, but it unfortunately > > > > contains a header which confuses my antique browser, specifically > > > > the last "Content-Type: application/x-perl

Bug#109148: marked as done ([joey: Archive of debian-openoffice])

2002-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:42:28 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#149845: marked as done (lists search broken?)

2002-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:12:48 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#155305: July 31st shown as July 30th twice

2002-10-27 Thread Josip Rodin
reassign 155305 mhonarc thanks Hi, The page in question is http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-french/2002/debian-l10n-french-200207/maillist.html I don't see anything in our .rc file that could cause this so I'm reassigning the bug to mhonarc proper. I could be wrong, though, so feel free to bo

Bug#155305: July 31st shown as July 30th twice

2002-10-27 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Please supply the .rc file with the bug report (or a link to it) -Jeff On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 07:23, Josip Rodin wrote: > reassign 155305 mhonarc > thanks > > Hi, > > The page in question is > http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-french/2002/debian-l10n-french-200207/maillist.html > > I don't se

Bug#155305: July 31st shown as July 30th twice

2002-10-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 02:51:11PM -0800, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > Please supply the .rc file with the bug report (or a link to it) It's at file://lists.debian.org/org/lists.debian.org/mhonarc/debian.rc -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Bug#145470: marked as done (listarchives: I found ancient list archives, dating back to 95)

2002-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:29:08 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Processed: July 31st shown as July 30th twice

2002-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 155305 mhonarc Bug#155305: lists.debian.org: Doesn't display 'Jul 31' Bug reassigned from package `listarchives' to `mhonarc'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administra

Processed: it's not exactly "nothing but spam", but it's close...

2002-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 108958 lcs-eng archive has a bunch of spam Bug#108958: listarchives: lcs-eng is nothing but spam Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: .

2002-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 155425 archive indices don't recognize ISO-8859-15 and KOI8-r properly Bug#155425: lists.debian.org: Use new mhonarc, use UTF-8 Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bu

Re: Improving the footer for DWN

2002-10-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 09:46:20PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > I'd like to update the way the footer is created for DWN. > This worked well when Joy was preparing DWN, since not much changed. ^ e :) > Therefore, I'd rather like to have an additional mechanism to speci

Re: http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals update

2002-10-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 12:16:14PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Description of "Debian GNU/Linux: Guide to Installation and Usage" in > http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals . If no one objects, I would > like to change with following patch. > If I hear no noise I will change it in a few days :-)

Vagas abertas

2002-10-27 Thread Paulo
Empresa de São Paulo procura interessados com internet, para trabalhar em tempo parcial ou integral, com altos ganhos. Visite: www.redebiz.com.br/pri Paulo

Improving the footer for DWN

2002-10-27 Thread Martin Schulze
I'd like to update the way the footer is created for DWN. At the moment, we're using wml::debian::weeklynews::footer which has a large sliced switch statement to reflect the different set of authors for DWN. This worked well when Joy was preparing DWN, since not much changed. However, recently it

http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals update

2002-10-27 Thread Osamu Aoki
Description of "Debian GNU/Linux: Guide to Installation and Usage" in http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals . If no one objects, I would like to change with following patch. [Proof] $ apt-cache policy debian-guide debian-guide: Installed: 1.0.1 Candidate: 1.0.1 Version Table: *** 1.0.1 0

mailing list pages

2002-10-27 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi, I've further tidied up the subscription and unsubscription capabilities of http://lists.debian.org// They'll no longer allow such requests for (or link to active stats of) mailing list that are gone, and there's one single form instead of two (God bless :), and it's also at the top of those p

Makefile broken

2002-10-27 Thread Jordi Mallach
Hi, webwml/*/international/Makefile seems to be broken for all languages except Catalan. I guess I didn't notice I had to change it everywhere at the time I committed our stuff. Is there a script to make the update everywhere, should I do it by hand, or is someone else in charge of these things?

Bug#154724: marked as done (listarchives: Minor issue with the unsubscribe page)

2002-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:09:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed a while ago has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Processed: stuff

2002-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 154140 -1 Bug#154140: listarchives: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" should work Bug 154140 cloned as bug 166640. > reassign 154140 lists.debian.org Bug#154140: listarchives: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" should work Bug reassigned from package `listarchives' to `lists

Re: redirect.pl sez Content-Type: application/x-perl

2002-10-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:07:46PM -0400, Lou Poppler wrote: > > > This script produces a 302 redirect response, but it unfortunately > > > contains a header which confuses my antique browser, specifically > > > the last "Content-Type: application/x-perl " > > > > > >

Bug#166584: marked as done (packages.d.o/skipstone doesn't work)

2002-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:13:40 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#166584: packages.d.o/skipstone doesn't work has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Re: Utils page almost empty...

2002-10-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 01:27:02PM +0100, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > I just noted that > http://packages.debian.org/stable/utils/ > comes up with only two packages... That's too few, isn't it...? > Something gone wrong in the generation of pages? Yes, a temporary problem due to excessive copying a

Bug#166584: packages.d.o/skipstone doesn't work

2002-10-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: www.debian.org Version: unavailable; reported 2002-10-27 Severity: normal <-- snip --> $ lynx -dump http://packages.debian.org/skipstone Debian package search results _ Release Package (

Utils page almost empty...

2002-10-27 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
Hi folks! I just noted that http://packages.debian.org/stable/utils/ comes up with only two packages... That's too few, isn't it...? Something gone wrong in the generation of pages? Best, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Astrophysicist/IT Consultant/Skeptic/Ski-orienteer/Orienteer/Mountaineer [EMAIL