Re: Removal of Email Address

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 12:46:48PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Adding some twists to make e-mail address not too obvious to the stupid > spam crawler may still be useful. One thing which already defeats 90% of those stupid spam spiders is to encode the "mailto:"; and "@" in email addresses, e.g. "&

Re: cd cover broken link

On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 01:34:12PM -0700, Aaron Imbrock wrote: > this link goes nowhere. Ironically, it's the coolest picture too. Yeah, we're aware of the problem. is hosted on some very unreliable free webspace service. If you retry from ti

Re: Removal of Email Address

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:13:33PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Only the usual ones about letting the spammers win, crippling those who > read from the archives and might want to contact one, etc. I agree. More than once I have found an address I was looking for in the webarchives. It wouldn't be coo

Re: Removal of Email Address

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:13:33PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Josip Rodin wrote: > > That sounds acceptable to me. Does anyone have any objections? > > Only the usual ones about letting the spammers win, crippling those who > read from the archives and might want to contact one, etc. E-mail addres

Re: Removal of Email Address

Josip Rodin wrote: > That sounds acceptable to me. Does anyone have any objections? Only the usual ones about letting the spammers win, crippling those who read from the archives and might want to contact one, etc. -- see shy jo

package-searching for non-x86

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Searching for a package on the debian-homepage (selecting packages under navigation) for anything bux x86 (in this case selecting ARM and searching for pcmcia) the search-result will be for x86. Marcus -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

LISTS

lists

Re: Removal of Email Address

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:01:40AM -0500, Cesar Mendoza wrote: > The default look is something like this: > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED] That sounds acceptable to me. Does anyone have any objections? (This should wait at least until Monday.) -- 2. That which causes joy or

Re: Removal of Email Address

Hi, The default look is something like this: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bye Cesar Mendoza http://www.kitiara.org -- "The three golden rules to ensure computer security: Do not own a computer, do not power it on, and do not use it." --Robert T. Morris On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 0

Re: Removal of Email Address

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 09:00:30AM -0500, Cesar Mendoza wrote: > Mhonarc supports email mangling using the tag. I added > to the debian.rc, but right now is commented. Once enabled (If we decide > to do it), we are going to have to regenerate the whole archive. What exactly does it do to the ema

Re: Removal of Email Address

Hi Joy, Mhonarc supports email mangling using the tag. I added to the debian.rc, but right now is commented. Once enabled (If we decide to do it), we are going to have to regenerate the whole archive. Bye Cesar Mendoza http://www.kitiara.org -- "The three golden rules to ensure computer securit

Re: Removal of Email Address

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:24:36PM +0200, Davide Puricelli wrote: > > Read the rest of the disclaimer, it also says: > > > > Debian disclaims all warranties with regard to information posted on its > > mailing lists, whether posted by Debian or others; this disclaimer includes > > all implied warr

Re: Removal of Email Address

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:23:37PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Read the rest of the disclaimer, it also says: > > Debian disclaims all warranties with regard to information posted on its > mailing lists, whether posted by Debian or others; this disclaimer includes > all implied warranties of merch

Re: General to-do page

Le ven 30/08/2002 à 09:41, Gerfried Fuchs a écrit : > Looks nice (just tested it with w3m so I can't really say how it looks > anyway ;). Well, I tried to keep a design close to that of the devel/ page. > There is one problem here: You should make the *.item files also *.wml > files so they c

Re: Removal of Email Address

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:04:32PM +0200, Davide Puricelli wrote: > > This was posted to a Debian Project mailing list. These mailing lists are > > public forums using SMTP (e-mail), and they are freely distributed to > > thousands of subscribers around the world, as well as to several web page > >

Re: Removal of Email Address

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:35:59PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > This was posted to a Debian Project mailing list. These mailing lists are > public forums using SMTP (e-mail), and they are freely distributed to > thousands of subscribers around the world, as well as to several web page > archives. It

Bug#158787: marked as done (www.debian.org: /releases/stable/errata has wrong deb line)

Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:30:47 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#158787: www.debian.org: /releases/stable/errata has wrong deb line has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Re: Please remove my email address from lists.debian.org

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 04:48:42PM +1200, Grant Pritchard wrote: > Please remove my post from the list archive (see the URL below). > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2002/debian-ctte-200204/msg1.html This was posted to a Debian Project mailing list. These mailing lists are public forum

Re: Removal of Email Address

On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:45:10AM -0400, Ian L. wrote: > Please remove my two email addresses, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > [EMAIL PROTECTED], from the following URL: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200110/msg00162.html This was posted to a Debian Project mailing list. Thes

Bug#158787: www.debian.org: /releases/stable/errata has wrong deb line

* Noel Koethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 22:31]: > the deb lines at "Point releases" > > # proposed additions for a 3.0 point release > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/proposed-updates/ > deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US dists/proposed-updates/ > > doesn't work. ap

Re: General to-do page

* Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 23:35]: > Recently, the idea of a general to-do page for Debian, summarizing what > tasks or teams need help, has been brought up on debian-private. > I have done a prototype of such a page, which you can see at > http://people.debian.org/~joss/nee

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by kubota: webwml/english/News/weekly/2002/33 index.wml

Hi, At Fri, 30 Aug 2002 07:55:03 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > > I have never committed UTF-8 wml files. "&;" expression is > > written in ASCII > [...] > > and this is also UTF-8. My intension was that: files with "&;" can be opened, closed, saved, inputed, and edited safely with any

A question about artaffairs.com???

Hi, I found you online and I was wondering if you'd able to tell me if advertising in http://www.ArtAffairs.com is a good idea?? I have a picture frame manufacturing company in California and I'm looking for differing advertising channels. I will appreciate your input! Hayk Terzibashian Nove

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by kubota: webwml/english/News/weekly/2002/33 index.wml

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 10:54:26AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote: > Hi, > > At Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:37:25 +0200, > Denis Barbier wrote: > > > > This problem would of course go away if we would switch to using UTF-8 > > > everywhere, but I guess that will never happen... > > > > But Kubota-san did