On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 05:47:40PM +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote:
> Matt Kraai:
>
> > +# canonicalize weird names until [EMAIL PROTECTED] fixes them
> > +if ($ldap_cn eq "Bjorn" and $ldap_sn eq "Brenander") {
> > +$ldap_cn = "Bj\xf6rn";
>
> If this is meant to be include
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:26:36PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Modified files:
> > english/ports/alpha: port-status.wml
> >
> > Log message:
> > tweaked the verbiage
>
> Uhm, the last sentence for sid is still misleading:
>
> "At this point, no potential release date has been dete
Matt Kraai:
> +# canonicalize weird names until [EMAIL PROTECTED] fixes them
> +if ($ldap_cn eq "Bjorn" and $ldap_sn eq "Brenander") {
> +$ldap_cn = "Bj\xf6rn";
If this is meant to be included by several languages' it needs to be
written "Björn".
> +} elsif ($
* Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-09 06:27]:
> Modified files:
> english/ports/alpha: port-status.wml
>
> Log message:
> tweaked the verbiage
Uhm, the last sentence for sid is still misleading:
"At this point, no potential release date has been determined."
sid won't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 142001 patch
Bug#142001: devel/people: duplicate entries
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBS
tag 142001 patch
thanks
The following patch should fix this problem, though it would be
nicer if [EMAIL PROTECTED] would fix the names in the
database.
Matt
--- people.pl.orig Tue Jun 11 08:40:32 2002
+++ people.pl Tue Jun 11 08:52:10 2002
@@ -462,6 +462,12 @@
$homepageurl
Gerfried Fuchs:
> Uhm, do we have doubled tags here? What is the difference between
> and ?
Yes, there are two tags. is the numeric version and
is the name.
They are defined in english/releases/info
--
\\//
Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail acc
* Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-10 10:19]:
> I've changed it to use `', but this
> doesn't address the above concern.
Uhm, do we have doubled tags here? What is the difference between
and ? I haven't checked the
source yet but if they are the same shouldn't be one dropped in favor of
我们专门帮助中小企业实现全面的数字化管理，致力于信息管理软件的开发和服务。我们本着"顾客的成功，就是我们的承诺"的精神理念，为多家企业度身开发了实用高效的企业管理软件。凭着过硬的技术和优质的服务赢得了客户的信任。
主要承接：工厂企业管理软件开发、各行各业的进销存管理软件开发、零售业的管理系统开发、专业网站建设以及系统维护等。欢迎来电咨询！
如想了解更详细信息,请浏览我们的网站：
http://www.neterway.com
受朋友推荐，发信给您，若是有所打扰，我们深感抱谦，您可以马上删除。
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Noèl Köthe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-10 12:14]:
> shouldn't we change the "potato" in the apt line on this
> page to "stable", so we don't have to change it every release?
Personally don't think so, read my other reply to the same issue. Only
thing I'd think that would be good to sugguest is
* Morten Brix Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-10 11:52]:
> At http://www.debian.org/security/, the suggested security line to add
> to sources.list points at 'potato'. Shouldn't this point at 'stable'
> instead?
I don't think so. It has different meanings. If you would change it
to stable
11 matches
Mail list logo
