Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > It might be nice if you could just mass-NMU (maybe to DELAYED/1-day)
> > with Build-Depends updated.
>
> Agree. I was hoping you, the pbuilder dude, may volunteer :)
Hmm... if it's not automatic, things are a bit difficult.
I'm not insi
From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: problem generating PDF output for large DebianDoc docs
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:34:27 -0500
> > If tetex-bin >= 1.0.7+20011202-5.1 then it might help you
> > to add /etc/texmf/texmf.d/90boot (or something appropriate
> > name) which co
Atsuhito Kohda ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: problem generating PDF output for large DebianDoc docs
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 21:26:47 -0500
>
> > After somewhat more rigorous testing on some larger documents it appears
> > that
> > we run i
From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: problem generating PDF output for large DebianDoc docs
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 21:26:47 -0500
> After somewhat more rigorous testing on some larger documents it appears that
> we run into the default pool sizes of LaTeX. I'm not sure where ex
Hi,
After somewhat more rigorous testing on some larger documents it appears that
we run into the default pool sizes of LaTeX. I'm not sure where exactly the
boundary lies, but the debian-policy (350K) is definitely too big to be turned
into a PDF document; the PS version can be generated without
Hi,
I just uploaded a new version of debiandoc-sgml which has its urgency set to
high to speed up things. It now builds PDF and PS output in a bi-stable loop
(so various Makefiles can now be cleaned up and bug #134701 is closed).
Thanks,
Ardo
Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Apr
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 06:33:40PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Wouldn't it be smart to have a link from the CD web pages to the new
> netinst image? It mustn't be any worse than the existing links we
> have to ieure's and Elf's netinst CD images!
>
> Cf. http://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/
>
> Just
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:07:42AM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> PS: My "Debian reference" in DDP CVS/WEB needs to be packaged. Any
> volunteer? I am not Debian developer.
As I am translating it to Finnish so it is quite natural for me to package
it. Of course, one requirement is that my applica
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:27:43PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> Package: listarchives
> Version: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:27:13 +0200
>
> Hi,
> it seems that debian-boot is not archived sinve 2002-04-07 - The last
> mails are around 07/08 of April.
>
If you look at the top of
http://lists.debian.
Your message dated Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:42:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#143859: debian-boot unarchived since 2002-04-07
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:27:43PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> Package: listarchives
> Version: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:27:13 +0200
>
> Hi,
> it seems that debian-boot is not archived sinve 2002-04-07 - The last
> mails are around 07/08 of April.
No there is no problem,
You are only reading th
Package: listarchives
Version: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:27:13 +0200
Hi,
it seems that debian-boot is not archived sinve 2002-04-07 - The last
mails are around 07/08 of April.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-5201-669912
Nine nineth on september the 9th
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 10:59:07PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Some coordinated rebuild activity may be a good idea for document created
> with known problematic version (1.1.59).
So far I've only heard about the broken installation documentation in
disks-* directory of the FTP archive, and seen it
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 01:33:05AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> generated japanese/index.ja.html is not group writable, thus it cannot be
> overwritten. Unfortunately it breaks build.
> I ran
>find /org/www.debian.org/webwml ! -perm -020 -a ! -user joy -ls
> and found other files which may ca
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Web pages created by /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/doc/*.wml needs update
to reflect recent Makefile changes at DDP site. More large
documentations are available as PDF.
See attached patch for the details.
Osamu
--
+
Kon'nichiwa Umekawa-san (Hi, Mr. Umekawa),
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:42:17PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
>
> > Since there seems to be another new debiandoc-sgml coming, it may take
> > few more days before new unstable version (1.1.66?) a
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> Since there seems to be another new debiandoc-sgml coming, it may take
> few more days before new unstable version (1.1.66?) appears into testing.
>
> Some coordinated rebuild activity may be a good idea for document created
> with known pro
Hi folks,
debiandoc-sgml in testing (1.1.59) is known to be very unfriendly to
the current links/lynx. Though the maintainer (Ardo) and I think this
is browser issue, we think it is practical to fix debiandoc-sgml and
build pages with new version. And that is what is happening in unstable
but ha
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:04:11AM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> Oops! Bug alert! Could you file a bug report against debiandoc? I've
> already tested the fix as we speak, but this should go on record.
Please make sure to upload as "urgency=high". Otherwise very old
version stay in woo
Hi Chris this is Bug# 140677, (Sorry I CCed Ardo to get extra attention)
Besides, please drop supportive comments to bug #138240 and #138241
This is interesting situation. debiandoc-sgml in testing is known to
have problem. I think before woody release, Ardo needs to keep an eye
on situation a
Chris Tillman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 05:53:09PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > - Forwarded message from Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> >
> > Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 00:24:17 +0200
> > From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
> >
21 matches
Mail list logo
