Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is no notice of any confidentiality in the message(s) you
> cite. Furthermore, even if there were, the Debian Project was and
> is not party to any such agreements.
In the present case, the emails were sent by eemuconcept.com to a
particular
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 03:29:02PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > "loss of use"
> >
> > I simply have no idea what this means in this context :)
>
> It means if somebody posts a message to debian-user saying "hey, try
> setting this flag in your XF86Config-4", and that flag causes the X
> ser
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:06:06PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please explain these so I (and others) can translate in
> www.d.o/MailingLists/disclaimer:
>
> "all implied warranties of merchantability and fitness"
>
> I can understand an implied warranty of fitness, but merchantability?
Hi,
Please explain these so I (and others) can translate in
www.d.o/MailingLists/disclaimer:
"all implied warranties of merchantability and fitness"
I can understand an implied warranty of fitness, but merchantability? How
exactly do we implicitely guarantee that the stuff on the mailing lists i
Please review the Disclaimer for Debian's Public Mailing Lists:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/disclaimer
For your convenience, the text of this disclaimer follows:
Disclaimer for the Debian mailing lists
Our mailing lists are public forums, and our mailing list archives are public.
Hi,
I'm translating the Alpha Port's news page to Danish, but am not keen
on translating the rather outdated news items from 1999 and 2000 (I've
translated some of those).
Is it alright to stop somewhere, remove the untranslated items, and
provide a link to the English version?
--
Regards, Kaar
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 10:23:08AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > >> Both http://www.debian.org/ and http://www.debian.org/security/ did not
> > >> contain a link to the DSA-119-1 that went out on March 7th until over
> >
> > > They do now.
> >
> > Yes, but the bug is that the DSAs are not post
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Both http://www.debian.org/ and http://www.debian.org/security/ did not
> >> contain a link to the DSA-119-1 that went out on March 7th until over
>
> > They do now.
>
> Yes, but the bug is that the DSAs are not posted whe
8 matches
Mail list logo
