Re: Ports disappeared from www.debian.org?

2001-12-13 Thread James A. Treacy
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:43:38PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote: > * James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011213 18:27]: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:35:06PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: > > > The term 'Ports' itself is in effect an i386-ism. Supported > > > Architectures is much more descriptive to

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by csmall: webwml/english/misc merchandise.def merchandis ...

2001-12-13 Thread James A. Treacy
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 04:08:25PM -0800, Debian WWW CVS wrote: > CVSROOT: /cvs/webwml > Module name: webwml > Changes by: csmall 01/12/13 16:08:25 > > Modified files: > english/misc : merchandise.def merchandise.data > > Log message: >Changed T-shirt to plural T-shirts

Re: Ports disappeared from www.debian.org?

2001-12-13 Thread Grant Bowman
* James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011213 18:27]: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:35:06PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: > > The term 'Ports' itself is in effect an i386-ism. Supported > > Architectures is much more descriptive to non-developer types. > > As always there are competing goals. Keeping

Re: Ports disappeared from www.debian.org?

2001-12-13 Thread James A. Treacy
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:35:06PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: > > The term 'Ports' itself is in effect an i386-ism. Supported > Architectures is much more descriptive to non-developer types. > As always there are competing goals. Keeping the string short is one of them. -- James (Jay) Treacy [

Re: Ports disappeared from www.debian.org?

2001-12-13 Thread Chris Tillman
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:04:20PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: > I really meant to push the point of keeping the ports link when your first > removed it. I guess my lone comment wasn't strong enough. :) > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 10:16:00PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > > (Before you complai

Re: Feedback for Craig Small on misc/merchandise:

2001-12-13 Thread Craig Small
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 11:06:33AM -0500, Jeff Albro wrote: > This page is easy to read, easy to scan, and accomplishes its mission. > It's great! All I have for you is a few nitpicky improvements. I'm glad you like it. It's basically a copy of the CD vendors page. > I don't believe you need th

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by danish: webwml/danish/international/l10n/data

2001-12-13 Thread James A. Treacy
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 10:25:20PM +0100, Kaare Olsen wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 22:08:50 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > >> Directory /cvs/webwml/webwml/danish/international/l10n/data added to the > >> repository > > >this directory is useless. > > I can't seem to get rid of it; while both i

Re: Ports disappeared from www.debian.org?

2001-12-13 Thread James A. Treacy
I really meant to push the point of keeping the ports link when your first removed it. I guess my lone comment wasn't strong enough. :) On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 10:16:00PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > > (Before you complain, I didn't pick that confusing term for the section > name.) > /me ducks. W

Re: Ports disappeared from www.debian.org?

2001-12-13 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Josip Rodin wrote: > It was under "Distribution", yeah. I don't quite see how this could fit > under distribution because the meaning of the word distribution there is > the act of distributing (and not as in a Linux distribution). > > (Before you complain, I didn't pick tha

Re: Intro WWW pages

2001-12-13 Thread James A. Treacy
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 12:06:41PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote: > > I agree, this shouldn't be done haphazardly. I was trying to get a more > concrete suggestion worked out about the content before moving on > through the process and bringing it to this list. I think it's great if > both lists par

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by danish: webwml/danish/international/l10n/data

2001-12-13 Thread Denis Barbier
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 10:25:20PM +0100, Kaare Olsen wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 22:08:50 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > >> Directory /cvs/webwml/webwml/danish/international/l10n/data added to the > >> repository > > >this directory is useless. > > I can't seem to get rid of it; while both i

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by danish: webwml/danish/international/l10n/data

2001-12-13 Thread Kaare Olsen
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 22:08:50 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: >> Directory /cvs/webwml/webwml/danish/international/l10n/data added to the >> repository >this directory is useless. I can't seem to get rid of it; while both it and "scripts" was removed from my local cvs tree and neither won't come bac

Re: Ports disappeared from www.debian.org?

2001-12-13 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 11:50:38AM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote: > > > Is it just me, or did the link to http://www.debian.org/ports disappear > > > from the main page? Any reason for this? > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2001/debian-www-200112/msg00011.html > > Josip, and the rest of

Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by danish: webwml/danish/international/l10n/data

2001-12-13 Thread Denis Barbier
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 12:47:35PM -0800, Debian WWW CVS wrote: > CVSROOT: /cvs/webwml > Module name: webwml > Changes by: danish 01/12/13 12:47:35 > > webwml/danish/international/l10n/data > > Update of /cvs/webwml/webwml/danish/international/l10n/data > In directory klecker:/tmp/cvs-se

Re: Intro WWW pages

2001-12-13 Thread Grant Bowman
* James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011213 11:03]: > Hmm. the person that wrote the following has no attribution in the mail > I'm responding to. Hi James, That was me. Kyle missed the attribution. > > > One of the biggest publicity items for Debian is it's website, however > > > the very im

Re: Ports disappeared from www.debian.org?

2001-12-13 Thread Randolph Chung
In reference to a message from Josip Rodin, dated Dec 08: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 02:08:22PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > > Is it just me, or did the link to http://www.debian.org/ports disappear > > from the main page? Any reason for this? > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2001

Re: Intro WWW pages

2001-12-13 Thread James A. Treacy
Hmm. the person that wrote the following has no attribution in the mail I'm responding to. > > > > One of the biggest publicity items for Debian is it's website, however > > the very important /intro/ section seems less than complete to me. I > > intend to help out in this area and I wanted to s

Re: problem on a www.debian.org page

2001-12-13 Thread Denis Barbier
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 03:59:48PM +0100, Benoit Rouits wrote: > Hello, > just a word to say that none of the links work in page : > http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-fr Yes, these pages were being redesigned, everything seems to be right just now. Please note that there has been some changes in

Processed: Re: Bug#123771: update-excuses info from package pages

2001-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 123771 www.debian.org Bug#123771: update-excuses info from package pages Bug reassigned from package `packages.debian.org' to `www.debian.org'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Re: New version of /intl/l10n/ pages

2001-12-13 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 01:06:11AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > Last, if build runs fine, Seems it did. :) > someone should remove old files to prevent > problems with content negociation: > cd /org/www.debian.org/debian.org/international/l10n > rm po-* templates-* team-* l10n* i18n* >

Re: New version of /intl/l10n/ pages

2001-12-13 Thread Denis Barbier
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 01:06:11AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: [...] > Last, if build runs fine, someone should remove old files to prevent > problems with content negociation: > cd /org/www.debian.org/debian.org/international/l10n > rm po-* templates-* team-* l10n* i18n* > and also remove