On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 05:49:06PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: unavailable (extremely probable) for roughly a 12 day period.
> Reply-To:
ok, i'm an idiot, stupid word wrap
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unavailable (extremely probable) for roughly a 12 day period.
Reply-To:
There's a good chance that I won't be available for much anything
in the next 12 days or so, there is a
peter karlsson:
> > if the current directory contains a .html file with no corresponding
> > .wml file, it deletes the .html file from there and the html directory.
> Perhaps a script is more efficient, one that can be run in all language
> directories after all the pages are created?
Please hav
James A. Treacy:
> if the current directory contains a .html file with no corresponding
> .wml file, it deletes the .html file from there and the html directory.
The question is, can that be done with Makefile magic, or do one need
to run a script on all directories?
Perhaps a script is more eff
Your message dated Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:30:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#90649: machines.cgi reports bad file descriptor
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 08:59:54AM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
> James A. Treacy:
>
> > There are files in the html directory which are not created using
> > wml. Got an idea how to seperate the chaff from the wheat(*)?
>
> Well, are they in the same directories as the other files? If not, then
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 04:48:10PM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 09:44:59AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 11:41:30AM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> > > Advocation is where a current Debian maintainer believe you have made
> > > enough
> >
>
James A. Treacy:
> There are files in the html directory which are not created using
> wml. Got an idea how to seperate the chaff from the wheat(*)?
Well, are they in the same directories as the other files? If not, then all
the old files could simply be removed before the make install is perform
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 08:30:37AM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
> James A. Treacy:
> > No.
>
> a) Why not?
There are files in the html directory which are not created using
wml. Got an idea how to seperate the chaff from the wheat(*)?
(*)English expression. Chaff is the seed coverings, etc that i
James A. Treacy:
> No.
a) Why not?
2) How do I fix it?
iii) Does anyone ever run "make clean" or similar on the output directory?
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:28:59AM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When documents are removed from the CVS, is there anything automatic
> that will remove the corresponding HTML file from the destination
> directory?
>
No.
--
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
There are still a few languages that have not yet switched over to use
translation-check instead of the syntax. Is
there any good reason for this, or should I just patch all the files?
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedi
Hi!
When documents are removed from the CVS, is there anything automatic
that will remove the corresponding HTML file from the destination
directory?
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
http://www.softwolves.pp.se/pe
13 matches
Mail list logo
