Re: bugs.debian.org

2000-10-31 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
> > > I'll see if I can set up some rewrite rules to new locations. However, it > > > might not be possible for most things. > > > > Just for the packages' pages would be enough... > > I tried it, and it worked (this is my second ever try at writing rewrite > rules): > >RewriteEngine on >

Bug#76004: Bug reporting "howto" page has bad URL to pseudo-package list

2000-10-31 Thread John Leuner
Package: www.debian.org Version: 2000-11-01 Severity: normal The "How to Report a bug in Debian" page at http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting has a link to pseudo-packages used for reporting bugs. The link to: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/ix/pseudopackages.html doesn't work. (Gives a 404 Not F

Bug#76003: DMUP lacking guidelines section

2000-10-31 Thread John Leuner
Package: www.debian.org Version: 2000-11-01 Severity: normal The DMUP (at http://www.debian.org/devel/dmup) says that "This document contains two parts: policies and guidelines." There is no guidelines section. John Leuner --

Re: bugs.debian.org

2000-10-31 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 10:51:26PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: > > > > > > > That address (http://$1/) does not work properly, some links are > > > > > > > broken > > > > > > > (e.g. /Bugs/db/ix/maintainers.html). > > > > > > The translation you are reading isn't synchronized with the English

Re: bugs.debian.org

2000-10-31 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
> > > > > > That address (http://$1/) does not work properly, some links are > > > > > > broken > > > > > > (e.g. /Bugs/db/ix/maintainers.html). > > > > > The translation you are reading isn't synchronized with the English > > > > > version, > > > > > which no longer contains the broken links. >

Re: Debian banner

2000-10-31 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Egon Willighagen wrote: > I can confirm the a Debian 2.1 banner is going around... i think i saw it > on freshmeat or slashdot, or maybe linuxtoday.com... And this was definately > after 2.2 was released... The OSDN sites still use an outdated banner; a new banner has been made (http://

Re: Debian banner

2000-10-31 Thread Daniel Migowski
Hi, On Tuesday 31 October 2000 19:32, Egon Willighagen wrote: > I can confirm the a Debian 2.1 banner is going around... i think i saw it > on freshmeat or slashdot, or maybe linuxtoday.com... And this was > definately after 2.2 was released... > > Egon [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Wed, Sep 13: > Ex

Re: Debian banner

2000-10-31 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Tuesday 31 October 2000 16:41, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > I can not see the banner (it rotates thru a list of banners). I have seen > something like what you describe at freshmeat, perhaps they can help? I can confirm the a Debian 2.1 banner is going around... i think i saw it on freshmeat o

RE: Debian banner

2000-10-31 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 31-Oct-2000 Martin Schulze wrote: > Hi, > > On 32BitsOnline.com a free banner ad for Debian is running, does anybody > know who made it and can provide me with a version that says 2.2 instead > of 2.1? > I can not see the banner (it rotates thru a list of banners). I have seen something lik

Debian banner

2000-10-31 Thread Martin Schulze
Hi, On 32BitsOnline.com a free banner ad for Debian is running, does anybody know who made it and can provide me with a version that says 2.2 instead of 2.1? Regards, Joey -- A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into theorems.