Thanks! I have checked the devel page, and found that our primary
web site has been updated :)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
at Fri, 2 Jun 2000 00:32:09 +0200,
on devel/join/,
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since James announced nm.debian.org on debian-devel-announce list al
On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 12:31:15AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That timing has been changed to 17:30 on purpose, to be 13:52 (dinstall
> start) + the time it took for dinstall to finish (while it was still on
> master) + a little bit of overhead, just in case. Therefore it would be
> bette
On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 12:32:09AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> Since James announced nm.debian.org on debian-devel-announce list already,
> and that contains links to the new New Maintainer Corner and to
> /devel/join/index.html page, which is a newer version of /devel/help.html,
>
Hi people,
Since James announced nm.debian.org on debian-devel-announce list already,
and that contains links to the new New Maintainer Corner and to
/devel/join/index.html page, which is a newer version of /devel/help.html,
I have updated english/template/debian/develbar.wml file to link to the
f
Hi,
Actually, it's not 17:30 local time on master, it's half an hour later,
because of ~archvsync/webmirrors/runmirrors script that has a `sleep 1800'
before other commands.
That timing has been changed to 17:30 on purpose, to be 13:52 (dinstall
start) + the time it took for dinstall to finish (w
Title: RE: complete clone of the debian website
Has anyone else thought of the fact that API is a really general term applied to every platform and piece of software known... It's sort of like Microsoft trademarking windows, or Debian trade-marking unix-like system (not that they did this).
On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 04:25:35PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > Whatever :) Even the Regents of the University of California have switched
> > to the better version of the license, which only strenghtens the position of
> > encouraging people to not use the advertising clause. The old v
Your message dated Thu, 1 Jun 2000 17:44:20 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#65037: www.debian.org: Mailing List Archive for
debian-devel is not up to date
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 08:35:59PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Whatever :) Even the Regents of the University of California have switched
> to the better version of the license, which only strenghtens the position of
> encouraging people to not use the advertising clause. The old version is
> histo
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A;
Severity: normal
The Mailing List Archive for debian-devel at
http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/ doesn't show the mails of the
last two weeks.
Your message dated Thu, 1 Jun 2000 12:31:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Thu, 1 Jun 2000 12:07:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Hi,
> Package: www.debian.org
> Version: 2211
> Severity: normal
>
> The search form at packages.debian.org does not return anything when
> searching for "bug". This occurs even if you set all possible options
> to max (search all versions and all releases).
Strange, this still happens.
The
Your message dated Thu, 1 Jun 2000 11:59:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
14 matches
Mail list logo
