Sure... so we have
http://www.debian.org/social_contract
http://www.debian.org/DFSG
http://www.debian.org/debian_intro [or some similarly creative title]
Otherwise we can also just link both the DFSG and contract from the navbar,
or just from the about pages. Whichever you choose is fine with
Hi,
Please ensure that the URL http://www.debian.org/social_contract
remains valid. I have been passing that around to people at the ALS,
and it should not be moved out from under.
manoj
--
When I was crossing the border into Canada, they asked if I had any
firearms with me.
Well.. I got the old security pages converted to the new look. Now I'm going
to get the last 6 months of alerts added. In the mean time, the existing pages
should be onsite in a day or two. I would appreciate people going over them
and giving me some feedback. Help me proofread them. I pretty
On Wed, Oct 28, 1998 at 11:01:34AM -0800, Darren Benham wrote:
> Notice: I had to make a change to /News/1998/Makefile to get the news files
> to
> compile properly. Basicly, I added the wml command at the bottom. I don't
> know about anyone else, but I was getting a "no rule" error.
>
Odd. I
On Wed, Oct 28, 1998 at 12:43:35PM -0500, Nils Lohner wrote:
>
> I'd agree except that the part I'm referring to are not a part of the social
> contract. The change is just in the intro to the contract. I can post this
> to -private if you like, but I don't see the need for it. Actually the '
No problem, sounds good. The trailer (Bruce wrote this, feel free to reuse
it) should go under both the DSFG and the Social Contract, right? I'm
assuming Bruce wrote both, and the reuse applies to both as well. Thanks!
Nils.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "James A. Treacy" writes:
>On Wed,
Notice: I had to make a change to /News/1998/Makefile to get the news files to
compile properly. Basicly, I added the wml command at the bottom. I don't
know about anyone else, but I was getting a "no rule" error.
Notice: I changed Make.templ.inc. JPG* variables were set up to scan for gif
fi
I'd agree except that the part I'm referring to are not a part of the social
contract. The change is just in the intro to the contract. I can post this
to -private if you like, but I don't see the need for it. Actually the 'We
are Debian..' sounds Borg-ish... maybe something more subtle like
On Wed, Oct 28, 1998 at 11:24:50AM -0500, Nils Lohner wrote:
>
Sorry if I'm being pedantic, but the social contract was approved
as is, so we really should at least mention any suggested changes
on debian-devel.
> I'd like a few changes to this page. I'll go through them one at a time,
> and ju
I'd like a few changes to this page. I'll go through them one at a time,
and justify them as well.
. "We are Software In The Public Interest, producers of the Debian GNU/Linux
system. This is the "social contract" we offer to
the free software community."
This needs to be changed to 'We are
Well, I'm speaking on the Spanish translation, that started in late
september IIRC.
The only big problem has been with the changes of some stuff:
- security, which now follows another scheme. And currently is
completely translated to Spanish.
- news, which have ch
11 matches
Mail list logo
