I have begun to compile the history of the Debian Project and SPI in
preperation for the Debian Birthday celebration and for the web site.
The first revision is available at
http://master.debian.org/~lowe/debian-history.txt
but is not complete. This is as much information as I have been able to
c
> This is supposed to be a manual in the Debian Documentation Project:
> Please contribute your work to the DDP.
Ok. Ian M. sent a reply, so I'll ask a few others. It'd be nice to ask
bruce, but I don't think that's really such a good idea at the moment ...
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> However, a list of common popular licenses that have been
> examined and are known to qualify would be a good thing, as long as
> no claim is made about correctness or completeness which may open us
> up to liability.
I've attached such a list.
Webmasters: Pleas
Philip Hands wrote:
> > Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah, but that's only option b). You also have option a), which is to
> > distribute binary and source together, like we do. Then you can drop
> > the source as soon as you drop the binary. The NPL has no such option.
>
>
Will Lowe wrote:
>> Please go ahead and collect information. IanM is probably a good point
>> or person to start.
>
>I've sent him a brief note asking for anything he can contribute. After I
>hear back from him I'll send a message to -devel requesting the same
>thing, and we'll see w
Will Lowe wrote:
> > This type of thing should be something open to all developers to work on.
> > The bottom of intro/about.html has been waiting for someone to work on
> > a history for over a year. It is best if we can get ANYONE to write
> > a history and we simply htmlize afterwards.
>
> Mayb
Hi,
>>"Martin" == Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> However I believe that we should maintain a list of other licenses
Martin> that are DFSG free so people can look it up, don't have to worry, don't
Martin> have to care etc. I'm not refering to every single license of every
M
> Philip Hands wrote:
> > Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This means that if we distribute modified versions of an NPL'd
> > > program, we're going to have to keep source packages around long after
> > > we have replaced the binaries with new versions. We have no mechanism
> > >
Philip Hands wrote:
> Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This means that if we distribute modified versions of an NPL'd
> > program, we're going to have to keep source packages around long after
> > we have replaced the binaries with new versions. We have no mechanism
> > in place for
Le Wed, 12 Aug 1998 10:44:48 -0400 (EDT) , <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (James A.
Treacy) a écrit:
«> Please use this instead:
«>
«> http://www.teaser.fr/~clebars/debian/f2dp/docs/markup.fr.html/index.html
«>
«Fixed. BTW, if you coordinate a translation effort, feel free to make
«modifications t
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This means that if we distribute modified versions of an NPL'd
> program, we're going to have to keep source packages around long after
> we have replaced the binaries with new versions. We have no mechanism
> in place for this.
Take a look at the GPL
11 matches
Mail list logo
