Hi All,
This article [1] covers some ground that we've discussed here before,
namely the diverse routes by which women end up in a career in IT. I
find it heartening to see this stuff written about in yet another
publication, though the figures suggesting that there is an overall
decrease in the p
--- martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can it call hooks? As a service to 4 of my female
> friends, I am
> currently using remind and a 3 Kb config file (!) to
> have a daily
> SMS sent to them as a reminder. I'd love to get rid
> of all the
> remind voodoo syntax and just call 'cycle --
also sprach Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.16.1455 +0200]:
> I can forward your idea upstream, or think more deeply
> about it, but I cannot find an elegant solution right
> now. Any ideas?
I would appreciate it. It's really low priority thought, since
remind is cumbersome but works.
Ur
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.16.1509 +0200]:
> Urks, a GUI programme. Why don't people create command line tools
> and put GUIs on top anymore???
What I actually meant is: why don't people create UI-agnostic cores
anymore and make the UI a "dumb client"?... thanks for R
martin f krafft wrote:
Urks, a GUI programme. Why don't people create command line tools
and put GUIs on top anymore???
My thoughts, exactly! And I suppose the ~/.cycle/username data file
is in a form that you can't read or manually edit because of the
password protection, but it is annoying. If I
Hi,
~/.cycle/username can be easily retrieved just using a
python's module and knowing the password. I wouldn't
like such sensitive data to be stored in plain text in
a file.
Maybe adding some export/import script?
Greetings,
Miry
--- Avery Ke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.16.1610 +0200]:
> ~/.cycle/username can be easily retrieved just using a
> python's module and knowing the password. I wouldn't
> like such sensitive data to be stored in plain text in
> a file.
Why the heck is it password protected anyway? It's
--- martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [2005.04.16.1610 +0200]:
> > ~/.cycle/username can be easily retrieved just
> using a
> > python's module and knowing the password. I
> wouldn't
> > like such sensitive data to be stored in plain
> text
also sprach Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.16.1626 +0200]:
> Keep in mind that the program is multiplatform and it
> is also developed for windows and other OSes. Also,
> data for more than one user can be stored.
All modern OSs have multiple user accounts and protected areas to
store da
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Helen Faulkner wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This article [1] covers some ground that we've discussed here before,
> namely the diverse routes by which women end up in a career in IT. I
> find it heartening to see this stuff written about in yet another
> pub
Hello Miriam,
Am 2005-04-16 16:10:58, schrieb Miriam Ruiz:
> Hi,
>
> ~/.cycle/username can be easily retrieved just using a
> python's module and knowing the password. I wouldn't
> like such sensitive data to be stored in plain text in
> a file.
I do not understand, what you mean :-)
I have so
Hi Martin,
Am 2005-04-16 16:17:13, schrieb martin f krafft:
> Why the heck is it password protected anyway? It's already in the
> home directory, so ~/.cycle should be permission 700. And root can
> get at the data with or without password (just wait until you enter
> it, then get the data from m
Am 2005-04-16 16:26:33, schrieb Miriam Ruiz:
> Hi again :)
>
> Keep in mind that the program is multiplatform and it
> is also developed for windows and other OSes. Also,
> data for more than one user can be stored.
Sorry Miriam,
But under Windows each $USER has a home directory which can have
also sprach Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.17.0036 +0200]:
> > I understand it's somewhat personal data, but not really much more
> > than your email and the like.
>
> Ssee the ~/.fetchmailrc which contain the $USER passwords for his/her
> E-Mail accounts. fetchmail refuse to work,
Am 2005-04-17 00:33:17, schrieb martin f krafft:
> also sprach Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.17.0036 +0200]:
> > Ssee the ~/.fetchmailrc which contain the $USER passwords for his/her
> > E-Mail accounts. fetchmail refuse to work, if it is world or group
> > readable.
>
> Do you k
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Since I have curenly no working Macintosh (IIvx + iMac premiere
> generation) running, I do not know with it, but MacOS X on eMac has
> protected $USER directories too.
OS 9 and earlier MacOSes do not have a real concept of multiple users,
however the
also sprach Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.17.0241 +0200]:
> Violating privacy of $USER ?
If you cannot trust your admin, don't use the system. So why
encrypt?
> ROOT $USERS, which look in users $HOME should be killed.
Just don't use their systems.
--
Please do not send copies o
17 matches
Mail list logo