On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Maria Nelson wrote:
> I'm learning to build gpsim, it's up for adoption anyway. I think the latest
> debian version is 0.22.0-5, but the one I'm able to download from
> sourceforge is 0.22.0, so it seems that debian has a newer version than
> upstream is distribut
Hi Lars, Kev,
So far, people on DW have been really helpful. So I thank you all for being
patient.
I'm learning to build gpsim, it's up for adoption anyway. I think the latest
debian version is 0.22.0-5, but the one I'm able to download from
sourceforge is 0.22.0, so it seems that debian has a ne
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 03:54:39PM -0800, Maria Nelson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Before a program can be turned into a Debian package, it should be build-able
> with just the regular ./configure, make, make install sequence. Is that
> correct?
>
> Also, when you go to build a package, and it doesn't b
pe, 2008-12-12 kello 15:54 -0800, Maria Nelson kirjoitti:
> Before a program can be turned into a Debian package, it should be
> build-able with just the regular ./configure, make, make install
> sequence. Is that correct?
It is not actually necessary for the upstream build system to follow
that f
Hi All,
Before a program can be turned into a Debian package, it should be
build-able with just the regular ./configure, make, make install sequence.
Is that correct?
Also, when you go to build a package, and it doesn't build, what are your
options? Do you contact that upstream author? Is that act
5 matches
Mail list logo
