st Christine Spang and Monica who
> come to my mind without looking into ldap. :)
Anyone is free to help here:
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWomen/Projects/Statistics
Your name should be fixed, IMHO.
--
.''`.The world breaks everyone, and afterward, some are
: :&#x
Hey!
* u [2016-01-19 14:08:38 CET]:
> Could somebody complete this data?
>
> Number of voting DDs 2015: 1033
> (I suppose that that's not the number of all DDs, right? Are these only
> active DDs?)
>
> Number of female DDs: 11
How did you came up with those names? Because it's missing m
as up-to-date as I thought
> > initially.
>
> Is demonichi in there? I kind of remember she was a DD, I'm off to ask
> Branden.
I just added her + her retirement.
I'll leave somebody else to update the statistics and the graphs in the wiki.
Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
> After sending my previous email I checked a bit more carefully and I
> added 3 female DD. There is probably more people missing from the
> years 2013-2015. The page wasn't as much as up-to-date as I thought
> initially.
Is demonichi in there? I kind of remember she was
9, 2016 at 01:08:38PM +, u wrote:
>>> The data about female participation is at this page:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWomen/Projects/Statistics
>>>
>>> I would say is up-to-date.
>>
>> Thanks a lot! Not sure how exactly I missed thi
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:29:37PM +, u wrote:
> Hi Ana,
>
> Ana Guerrero Lopez:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:08:38PM +, u wrote:
> > The data about female participation is at this page:
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWomen/Projects/Statistics
&
Hi Ana,
Ana Guerrero Lopez:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:08:38PM +, u wrote:
> The data about female participation is at this page:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWomen/Projects/Statistics
>
> I would say is up-to-date.
Thanks a lot! Not sure how exactly I missed this
Hi u!
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:08:38PM +, u wrote:
> Hi!
>
> just for myself and for fun I wanted to recompile some statistics on
> women in Debian. (Last data I have in memory is about 10 years old - and
> looks pretty much the same as what I've found for the presen
Hi!
just for myself and for fun I wanted to recompile some statistics on
women in Debian. (Last data I have in memory is about 10 years old - and
looks pretty much the same as what I've found for the present situation).
I am not sure if it's very useful. And I am sure that the discus
time to time. And before any official initiative (as
starting IRC training sessions) post an official announce with the help of
publicity team: they're very helpful in this kind of stuff. And this could
help us reaching more people. :)
What do you think?
== Statistics ==
Hey Ho, Let's Go! I&
2010/8/26 Margarita Manterola :
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>
>> if those first uploaders keep contributing without turning into DDs or
>> DMs, or if they just get tired and go away. Would it be possible to
>> also have some data comparing the dates of the first upload an
Hi Marga and list,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:32:57AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For the piece of news I'm preparing about DW, I compiled a statistic
> of female participation in Debian.
>
> You can see the results at: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWo
t; > are comparable. Would it be possible to try to get some indicators
> > from the statistics in the way I'm mentioning? It might provide clues
> > about the most effective measures to take.
>
> This one is more tricky, because even if the first upload info is
> ther
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 23:13, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>
> Finally, I would here probably avoid listing names (you of
> course know that some contributing women prefer avoiding to advertize
> their gender: here again, I have real examples in mind in the l10n
> world).
He has a point. This is not
be possible to try to get some indicators
> from the statistics in the way I'm mentioning? It might provide clues
> about the most effective measures to take.
This one is more tricky, because even if the first upload info is
there, the creation of DD account is not listed in the main p
On 26 August 2010 05:12, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Looking at the graph at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWomen/Statistics
> has made me think. The blue line is increasing at a some speed (about
> 3 or 4 first uploads per year), what means that we're constantly
>
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 06:12:06AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> Looking at the graph at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWomen/Statistics
> has made me think. The blue line is increasing at a some speed (about
> 3 or 4 first uploads per year), what means that we're constantly
> havin
Hi all!
Looking at the graph at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWomen/Statistics
has made me think. The blue line is increasing at a some speed (about
3 or 4 first uploads per year), what means that we're constantly
having new women doing packaging stuff. On the other side, the red an
yellow
2010/8/24 Margarita Manterola :
> I know. But that's one of the things that we are trying to fix with
> debian-women, isn't it? There is nothing wrong with being a woman,
> and there should be nothing wrong about letting the world know about
> it. In any case, we obviously wouldn't want to list
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:32:57AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For the piece of news I'm preparing about DW, I compiled a statistic
> of female participation in Debian.
>
> You can see the results at: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWomen/Statistics
Wel
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> That might be feasible for translations (though limiting to
> translations "belonging" to Debian is sometimes tricky),
I'd appreciate your help in getting a list, even if it's not perfect.
> Finally, I would here probably avoid listing
Quoting Margarita Manterola (margamanter...@gmail.com):
> Hi!
>
> For the piece of news I'm preparing about DW, I compiled a statistic
> of female participation in Debian.
>
> You can see the results at: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWomen/Statistics
>
> The graph i
Hi!
For the piece of news I'm preparing about DW, I compiled a statistic
of female participation in Debian.
You can see the results at: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWomen/Statistics
The graph is only about packaging (first uploads, DD accounts, DM
keys). It'd be nice to compile sim
"Miriam Ruiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2007/5/26, Yuwei Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Just noticed that the list's subscription number has dropped a lot recently
>> http://lists.debian.org/stats/debian-women.png>. Any explanations?
> Does the peak match the creation of the Ubuntu Women mailing l
2007/5/26, Yuwei Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Just noticed that the list's subscription number has dropped a lot
recently
http://lists.debian.org/stats/debian-women.png>. Any explanations?
Does the peak match the creation of the Ubuntu Women mailing list? does
anyone know?
I guess the DebCo
Hi,
Just noticed that the list's subscription number has dropped a lot recently
http://lists.debian.org/stats/debian-women.png>. Any explanations?
Cheers.
Best wishes,
yuwei
--
Yuwei Lin | yuwei at ylin dot org
http://www.ylin.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
more from now on.
Don't worry, to balance it in the statistics I'm quiet most of the time :-)
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Quantity derives from measurement, figures from quantities,
comparisons from figures, and victories from comparisons.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 02:11:43PM +0100, Helen Faulkner wrote:
> Hi Liz, all,
My apologies, I must've accidently missed Liz's response in my bleary-eyed
morning purge of spam. I'm sorry. =(
> liz wrote:
> >Hi!
> >Social conditioning perhaps? I have noticed in certain circumstances men
> >like t
Hi All
I still don't participate too much in this lists or the IRC channel,
sometimes because I'm still learning and I prefer to read first ;)
but I'll try to participate more from now on.
c.u.
On 4/25/06, Helen Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am curious to know how the t
Hi Liz, all,
liz wrote:
Hi!
Social conditioning perhaps? I have noticed in certain circumstances men
like to "talk over" me as I call it. I dont stand for it but I have seen
other females who get quiet or don't paricipate as much due. Perhaps the
inherent aggression in Male communication styl
Hi All,
Christian Perrier wrote:
Today, I did a few possibly interesting statistics about the IRC
channel.
Interesting indeed.
I have logs since June 2005 and I extracted all unique nicknames from
there. To these, I applied the knowledge I have of people and about
who is actually a man, who
> A contribution is of line by an individual
OK, I wrote this pretty late in the night...:-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Today, I did a few possibly interesting statistics about the IRC
channel.
I have logs since June 2005 and I extracted all unique nicknames from
there. To these, I applied the knowledge I have of people and about
who is actually a man, who is a woman and who I have no idea about (ie
I don't
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:17:39 +1100
Helen Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you think it is still needed to encourage the involvement of women?
Yes, until the women/men DD ratio reaches 1.0 at least ;-)
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Quantity derives from measurement, figures from quantities
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not sure if I'm even a newcomer yet, but...
Helen Faulkner wrote:
> Does this mean that people are happy with the list having relatively
> few posts to it, and don't miss the vigorous discussions that we've
> had at times in the past? (Personally
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 13:36 -0500, Erinn Clark wrote:
> * Andrea Schweer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:01:20 19:05 +0100]:
> > On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 11:17 +1100, Helen Faulkner wrote:
> > > Do you think it is still needed to encourage the involvement of women?
> >
> > Probably. Hell, if I were
Helen Faulkner wrote:
> I have just discovered the following graph (doubtless a resource that I should
> have known about months ago):
>
> http://lists.debian.org/stats/debian-women.png
400 people is *impressive* I am speechless.
> The slowness of the list in recent months has been worrying me,
* Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:01:21 12:18 -0300]:
> On 1/19/06, Helen Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you think the Debian Women project is still helping to encourage more
> > women to be involved in Debian?
>
> This is more difficult, we haven't seen any new faces r
* Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:01:21 00:32 +0100]:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 11:17:39AM +1100, Helen Faulkner wrote:
> > So, a couple of questions (these have been asked before, and will probably
> > be
> > asked again in the future):
> >
> > Is the Debian Women project meeting your n
* Andrea Schweer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:01:20 19:05 +0100]:
> On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 11:17 +1100, Helen Faulkner wrote:
> > Do you think it is still needed to encourage the involvement of women?
>
> Probably. Hell, if I were exposed to a bit more enthusiasm along the
> lines of "I'm looking fo
Hi!
On 1/19/06, Helen Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the Debian Women project meeting your needs? How could it do so better?
I guess it is... Although the mailing list is a bit "quiet", I tend to
ask my questions on IRC, and there's always someone who volunteers an
answer. Also, I s
Hi Helen and all:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 11:17:39AM +1100, Helen Faulkner wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have just discovered the following graph (doubtless a resource that I should
> have known about months ago):
>
> http://lists.debian.org/stats/debian-women.png
>
> It's interesting to me to not
Hi Helen, everyone,
here are my opinions as someone who subscribed to the list roughly 2
years ago and has mostly lurked silently since then.
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 11:17 +1100, Helen Faulkner wrote:
> So, a couple of questions (these have been asked before, and will
> probably be asked again in t
> Does this mean that people are happy with the list having relatively few posts
> to it, and don't miss the vigorous discussions that we've had at times in the
> past? (Personally I like most of the vigorous discussions, especially when
> they
> are productive in terms of achieving the goals of
Hi All,
I have just discovered the following graph (doubtless a resource that I should
have known about months ago):
http://lists.debian.org/stats/debian-women.png
It's interesting to me to note that, while the number of posts to this list has
varied widely, and has been relatively low for the
45 matches
Mail list logo
