On 3/09/10 1:04 AM, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
>> The options are no doubt reasonable in your timezone, but in mine they are at
>> 6am and 7am :( It's an ongoing problem in this game...
>
> Ooops! I'm not very expert in this kind of international stuff, so if you all
> have some standard time to th
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 05:02:28PM +0100, Lesley Binks wrote:
> On 3 September 2010 15:24, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I think that the winner option of our hour&date poll [1] is 21 UTC on
> > Saturday.
> > So, the next IRC meeting will be on Saturday (tomorrow) at 21 UTC.
> >
> >
> >
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 01:24:45PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Lesley Binks
> wrote:
> > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?day=3&month=9&year=2010&p1=0&p2=196&p3=176&p4=770
> >
> > shows the time differences between UTC and Pert
On 3 September 2010 17:24, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Lesley Binks
> wrote:
>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?day=3&month=9&year=2010&p1=0&p2=196&p3=176&p4=770
>>
>> shows the time differences between UTC and Perth (Australia), San
Hi
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Lesley Binks
wrote:
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?day=3&month=9&year=2010&p1=0&p2=196&p3=176&p4=770
>
> shows the time differences between UTC and Perth (Australia), San
> Diego (West Coast, USA) and New Delhi (india)
>
> So 2200 UTC
On 2 September 2010 16:04, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> Hi Helen,
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 08:44:41PM +1000, Helen Faulkner wrote:
>> On 1/09/10 8:07 PM, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
>>
>> > I've never used it, and I was curious so ... tadà!
>> > Here the link to vote: (I hope I've provided some reas
On 3 September 2010 15:24, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> Hi all,
> I think that the winner option of our hour&date poll [1] is 21 UTC on
> Saturday.
> So, the next IRC meeting will be on Saturday (tomorrow) at 21 UTC.
>
>
> The agenda will be:
>
> 1. wiki pages: update or not course's pages
> 2. stat
Hi all,
I think that the winner option of our hour&date poll [1] is 21 UTC on Saturday.
So, the next IRC meeting will be on Saturday (tomorrow) at 21 UTC.
The agenda will be:
1. wiki pages: update or not course's pages
2. statistics: much deeper analysis of women presence in Debian, collect
numb
Hi Helen,
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 08:44:41PM +1000, Helen Faulkner wrote:
> On 1/09/10 8:07 PM, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
>
> > I've never used it, and I was curious so ... tadà!
> > Here the link to vote: (I hope I've provided some reasonable options (I'm
> > totally new to this kind of stuff) ht
On 1/09/10 8:07 PM, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> I've never used it, and I was curious so ... tadà!
> Here the link to vote: (I hope I've provided some reasonable options (I'm
> totally new to this kind of stuff) http://www.doodle.com/wxeexnzkgke5cn95
The options are no doubt reasonable in your time
Quoting Vanessa Conchodon (nessie-deb...@little-monster.org):
> > Ah, well, it needs someone to package it in order to be installed on a
> > Debian server. Hint, hint..:-)
>
> You? ;o)
Doesn't work like this...:-). This list is about involving more women
in Debian, isn't it?
signature.asc
Des
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Vanessa Conchodon (nessie-deb...@little-monster.org):
>> Is'nt there a free doodle-like software (like papillon) available on a
>> debian server?
>
> Ah, well, it needs someone to package it in order to be installed on a
> Deb
Quoting Vanessa Conchodon (nessie-deb...@little-monster.org):
> Is'nt there a free doodle-like software (like papillon) available on a
> debian server?
Ah, well, it needs someone to package it in order to be installed on a
Debian server. Hint, hint..:-)
(I have a feeling that papillon might hav
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
>> We can set up a Doodle poll to decide the date.
>
> I've never used it, and I was curious so ... tadà!
> Here the link to vote: (I hope I've provided some reasonable options (I'm
> totally new to this kind of stuff) http://www.doodle
On 1 September 2010 11:07, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> Hi all!
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 09:52:42AM +0200, Anne Ghisla wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 08:31 +0100, Lesley Binks wrote:
>> > On 30 August 2010 23:54, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>> > > 2010/8/30 Francesca Ciceri :
>> [...]
>> > >> These are
Hi all!
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 09:52:42AM +0200, Anne Ghisla wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 08:31 +0100, Lesley Binks wrote:
> > On 30 August 2010 23:54, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > > 2010/8/30 Francesca Ciceri :
> [...]
> > >> These are the point I think we can discuss. So, if you're ok with the
>
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 08:31 +0100, Lesley Binks wrote:
> On 30 August 2010 23:54, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > 2010/8/30 Francesca Ciceri :
[...]
> >> These are the point I think we can discuss. So, if you're ok with the
> >> meeting
> >> we can decide the date ;)
> >
> > A new IRC meeting is OK for me
On 30 August 2010 23:54, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> 2010/8/30 Francesca Ciceri :
>
>> 3. Statistics: ok, we have done the first step. We have some numbers on
>> which discuss. But I think we can analyze much deeper this number, or if we
>> need, add more. I can try to compile a stastics for male DD/DM t
2010/8/30 Francesca Ciceri :
> 3. Statistics: ok, we have done the first step. We have some numbers on
> which discuss. But I think we can analyze much deeper this number, or if we
> need, add more. I can try to compile a stastics for male DD/DM to compare the
> female contributors statistics to s
Hi all,
I think it's time to collect impressions and ideas from
these days of "energy" in the list (83% eh?) and re-organize them in a IRC
session.
Maybe I become DW-IRC-Meeting addicted but I think it's important to discuss
some points as:
1. wiki: - what to do with past courses' pages? They are
20 matches
Mail list logo