Re: Core KDE member about HIG^W female contributors

On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 04:45:54PM +0200 or thereabouts, Herman Robak wrote: > On Sun, 15 May 2005 14:40:26 +0200, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/view/1051 [...] > Thus it spurs a debate we may not really want: The importance > of social skill

Re: Article on Debian Women

On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 03:43:08PM -0600 or thereabouts, David Moreno Garza wrote: > On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 10:51 -0800, Bruce Byfield wrote: > > My article on Debian Women is now posted at: > > > > http://os.newsforge.com/os/04/12/03/173216.shtml?tid=2 > > I don't know if 'feminists' is the righ

Re: No goals, selective memory, be nice, red nose day

On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 12:51:51AM +0100 or thereabouts, MJ Ray wrote: > Carla Schroder wrote: > > > I never did count you as a supporter, just a prime example of why > > groups like Debian-Women are needed. Though this is approaching > > comic relief. > > The next comic relief/red nose day is

Re: Debian, lists and discrimination

On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 10:21:54PM +0100 or thereabouts, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 12:22:05PM +0100, Helen Faulkner wrote: > > > > In my opinion no. In my opinion, debian does discriminate against > > women, in ways that the debian-women project is trying to address. See

Re: help wanted! get involved! make Debian-women work!

On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 04:56:05PM +0100 or thereabouts, Helen Faulkner wrote: > Can I ask a dumb question about manpages: Not dumb. > > >Just to let anyone who's interested in this issue know, there's a missing > >manpages project located here: http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html which > > Ju