Hi David,
On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 03:42:17PM +0200, David MartÃnez Moreno wrote:
> RapidSVN is a cross-platform GUI front-end for the Subversion revision
> system written in C++ using the wxWindows framework. This project also
> includes a Subversion client C++ API.
Cool. When you got somethin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
As the hpijs driver in my ghostscript packages does not make any sense
without the server provided by hpijs I want to add that package to
Debian as well.
License is GPL with a "only for use with HP printers" clause so it
will need to go into non-free for now.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 12:42:35AM +0300, Peter Novodvorsky wrote:
> Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * URL : http://dmake.wticorp.com/
> * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
You mean all of these licenses apply? More likely you forgot to
mention the license. I wan
Hi Bas,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:11PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> mosml#111560, filed: 129, changed 129
I can't believe it. This was the software I ITP'ed when I joined Debian.
It is actually quite nice but it uses GPL parts and links non-free
parts to i
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 11:21:23PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > debian/rules says:
> > | # to compile with debugging information:
> > | # $ debuild -e DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="debug,nostrip"
>
> That won't work, because it is syntactically incorrect,
> and also this is not a place to document how to
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 10:45:41AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I was saying that
> "DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="debug,nostrip" && debuild"
> is syntactically incorrect, and it looks bad to have it in debian/rules.
Guess I should read the whole thread before writing any comments next
time. Now I see you
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:36:31AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> p Is writing something like:
> Note that this license is not compatible with the GPL. This means that
> you can't redistribute the binary of osh if it is complied with libraries
> licensed under the GPL. The debian package is co
Hi Norbert,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:35:39AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> I'm looking for someone who wants to co-maintain vim, since I realized
> that I'm currently unable to take care of the package alone. There are
> a lot of open bugs that should be fixed, and there's also the upcomin
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hey Maintainers!
I am very sorry but I'll have to give away maintainership of OpenLDAP as
currently I can't devote the time which is needed to maintaining it. I
know this is really late and I regret not doing this step earlier.
The package description is:
This
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 02:13:15PM +0100, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> I'm willing to maintain this package, and sure this is a complex package
> and I really want to do that in team maintainence.
>
> Is there svn repository and or mailinglist for this package ?
Yes, see
http://svn.debian.org
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 02:15:11PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I am very sorry but I'll have to give away maintainership of OpenLDAP as
> > currently I can't devote the time which is needed to maintaining it. I
> > know this is really late and I regret not doing this step earlier.
>
> I can't a
Hi *,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 01:11:23PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >>> I'm willing to maintain this package, and sure this is a complex package
> >>> and I really want to do that in team maintainence.
>
> >>> Is there svn repository and or mailinglist for this package ?
>
> I see the SVN rep
Hi Vadim, Wences, ...,
is there any progress on this one? I just noticed that there is still no
bakefile in Debian an had to install it manually while working with the
wxPython sources.
The package built fine for me, what is holding it back from Debian? I
could sponsor an upload if needed...
Hi Daniel,
Am 2015-01-10 03:54, schrieb Daniel Stender:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Stender
* Package name: hovercraft
Version : 2.0b1
Upstream Author : Lennart Regebro
* URL : https://github.com/regebro/hovercraft
Wow! That looks like a tool t
Hi Fabian,
just a quick note to attach to this ticket. I am happy to have gsfonts
replaced, but I am not the maintainer anymore so I guess it is not up to
me to decide this. The "fun" with gsfonts is that it feels like warez in
that it is not even easy to find a download location. I guess that
I'd really like to adopt this package, given that I am currently
learning Scala and I think it would be a pity not to have a current
version in Debian.
I'll go and try to build the 2.11 version based on the last Debian
release by Mehdi.
Greetings, Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnp
D'oh, forgot to sign my last email. Here it is again with a signature,
if anybody cares. :-)
~~~
I'd really like to adopt this package, given that I am currently
learning Scala and I think it would be a pity not to have a current
version in Debian.
I'l
Have a look at this bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/494491
It looks for me like upstream would prefer not to have a Isabelle Debian
package. :-(
18 matches
Mail list logo
