Kevin,
On 1 December 2015 at 00:33, Kevin Murray wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Kevin Murray
>
> * Package name: libzstd
> Version : 0.4.0
> Upstream Author : Yann Collet
> * URL : https://github.com/Cyan4973
> * License : BSD
> Program
retitle 815760 ITP: dpdk -- Data Plane Development Kit
thanks
Hi Christian,
I'm setting the title for your ITP because you left the "Subject:"
line in the message body.
As I'm also not a DD, I can't help you with the sponsorship. Hope you
find someone interested!
Regards,
Tiago.
--
Tiago "Myh
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tiago Ilieve
* Package name: pythonpy
Version : 0.4.4
Upstream Author : Russell Stewart
* URL : https://github.com/Russell91/pythonpy
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : 'python -c'
Hi Gustavo,
How the packaging work is going? Are you still working on it? Looks
like the missing dependencies right now are "path-and-address"[1] and
"responses"[2].
I'm interested in seen this package in Debian as well. Let me know how
(and if) we can work together on this.
Regards,
Tiago.
[1]
control: owner -1 !
Gustavo,
On 1 April 2016 at 06:19, Gustavo Panizzo wrote:
> I'm interested on having it on Debian, unfortunately I won't have time
> to work on it in the near future, feel free to take this ITP
Thanks for the feedback! I'm taking the ownership of this ITP.
Regards,
Tiago.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tiago Ilieve
* Package name: python-path-and-address
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Joe Esposito
* URL : https://github.com/joeyespo/path-and-address
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description
control: owner -1 !
Hi Gustavo,
I'm taking the ownership of this ITP bug too, as we talked about
packaging Grip[1] in #790611.
Regards,
Tiago.
[1]: https://github.com/joeyespo/grip
[2]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790611#17
--
Tiago "Myhro" Ilieve
Blog: https://blog.myhr
Hi Kurt,
On 2 April 2016 at 11:15, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I don't actually have the time to work on this currently, but it's
> clearly something I want.
Wouldn't be better to fill an RFP, then take it as ITP when you are
available, if no one works on this in the mean time?
Regards,
Tiago.
--
Ti
Hi Fritz,
On 22 July 2016 at 21:15, Fritz Reichwald wrote:
> I also intend to package the dependency python3-pypeg2 do I have to write a
> seperate
> ITP for it?
Yes, please. Doesn't matter if it is a dependency for this one. Every
new package should close an ITP bug.
Regards,
Tiago.
--
Tiag
9 matches
Mail list logo